搜尋此網站

The topics discussed in this analysis update are as follows: The 10 Most Significant Regulatory News for Insurance Sector in 2025 The topics discussed in this analysis update are as follows: Regulatory Updates Tackling Unlicensed Referral Activities Overhauling Commission and Referral Fee Structure Indexed Universal Life Product RO-CPTD requirement and Reference Checking Scheme Market News Macau's Modernized Intermediary Regulations JD.com Enters Hong Kong Insurance Brokerage! Enforcement News IA's Imposes Against the Insurance Company affiliated with the Infamous Prince Group! Tahoe Life Fined $10 Million for Unauthorized Transactions Landmark First Conviction! Broker Fined for Failing to Submit Audited Statements ICAC Crackdowns on Dummy Agent Fraud Schemes Regulatory Updates 1. Tackling Unlicensed Referral Activities In May 2024, The Insurance Authority (IA) issued Circular outlines key principles to regulate referral business models prohibiting unlicensed referral activities conducted by “Mainland China Visitors” (MCV). In Jun 2025, IA’s undercover inspections in Tsim Sha Tsui uncovered unlicensed street sales issues, targeting MCVs, leading to shared findings with the industries. (For more information: IA - Speeches/Articles 2025-06-15 ) 2. Overhauling Commission and Referral Fee Structure To boost transparency and consumer protection, the IA introduced major reforms for participating policies. From 1 Jan 2026, mandates spreading commissions with at least 70% in the first year and 30% over the next five; to prevent front-loading issues. (Source: IA - Circular 2025-07-30 ; Practice Note ) From 1 Oct 2025 , licensed insurance broker(s) should not pay referral fess above 50% of the total commission received from insurer(s), exceed the benchmark required enhanced disclosure and explanation subject to closer monitoring by the IA. (Source: IA - Circular 2025-09-01 ) 3. Indexed Universal Life Product IA and HKMA clarified regulations for Indexed Universal Life (IUL) products in Apr 2025, classifying as Class C (i.e. linked long-term) tailored for professional investors only. (Source: IA&HKMA – Joint Circular 2025-03-13 ) 4. RO-CPTD requirement and Reference Checking Scheme From 1 Aug 2025 , RO must complete at least 2 RO-CPD hours focused specifically on management and control functions during each CPD assessment period. (Source: IA - Circular 2025-07-11 ) From 1 Jan 2026 , the Reference Checking Scheme recommend all licensed insurance companies mandating checks on prospective intermediaries' past seven years , covering agents and technical representatives in long-term business to prevent misconduct migration. Not mandate but breaching the scheme may lead to closer monitoring by the IA. (Source: IA - Circular 2025-11-20 ) Market News 5. Macau's Modernized Intermediary Regulations The Monetary Authority of Macau (AMCM) introduced the Insurance Intermediary Business Law ( Law No. 15/2024 ) effective 1 Aug 2025, replacing a 36-year-old framework ( Decree-Law No. 38/89/M ). 6. JD.com Enters Hong Kong Insurance Brokerage! JD.com (京東集團)'s Hong Kong subsidiary, Jingdong Insurance Consultants (Licensed No.: GB1101), secured the insurance brokerage license in Oct 2025. Enforcement News 7. IA's Imposes Against the Insurance Company affiliated with the Infamous Prince Group! On 28 Oct 2025, IA imposed strict license restrictions on Mighty Divine Insurance Brokers Limited (Licensed No.: FB1329). Due to the company's association with the notorious Prince Group (太子集團); founded by Chen Zhi (陳志) . IA prohibited it from engaging in any regulated activities. 8. Tahoe Life Fined $10 Million for Unauthorized Transactions On 2 Sep 2025, IA reprimanded Tahoe Life and imposed a $10M fine from shareholders' funds. Penalties for unauthorized related-party deals that bypassed board approval, violating policies and regs. (Source: IA - Enforcement 2025-09-02 ) 9. Landmark First Conviction! Broker Fined for Failing to Submit Audited Statements On 19 Mar 2025, IA won its first conviction under Insurance Ordinance s73(1). Aurex Insurance Brokers Ltd fined $26,060 by court for failing to submit audited statements, auditor's report, and compliance report within 6 months (twice). (Source: IA - Enforcement 2025-03-19 ) 10. ICAC Crackdowns on Dummy Agent Fraud Schemes In 2025, ICAC targeted "puppet" and "dummy" agent frauds, securing convictions in related cases. A former branch manager was sentenced to 46 months in Feb, with 10 agents receiving 11-22 months, for a 2016-2020 scheme that defrauded two insurers of over HK$52 million through 478 lapsed policies. (Source: ICAC - Press 2025-02-11 ) In October, police sergeant and five others were charged for HK$3 million in bogus commissions from Sun Life and China Taiping using fake credentials and dummy recruits. (Source: ICAC - Press 2025-10-08 ) The final six defendants in the $52M case were jailed 12-21 months in Nov 2025. (Source: ICAC - Press 2025-11-21 ) [End of ComplianceOne's Summary – The 10 Most Significant Regulatory News fo r Insurance Sector in 2025 ] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: ComplianceOne Newsletter – October 2022 ComplianceOne Newsletter – October 2022 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. The SFC Considers Authorization of Virtual Asset Futures Exchange Traded Funds ( VA Futures ETFs ) 2. HKEX Announces the Launch of Core Climate - A New International Carbon Marketplace 3. Court orders Sound Global ( 0967.HK ) Chairman to Purchase Shares from Investors 4. SFC Reprimands and Fines Asia Research & Capital Management Limited HK$1.75 million and Bans its MIC of Compliance 5. Former Account Executive of Fullbright Securities Limited Convicted of Securities Fraud 6. Court Convicted Wong King Hoi for Obstruction of SFC's Search Operation 7. SFC Bans a Former Licensed Staff of China Galaxy for Violation of Company's Staff Dealing Policy MARKET NEWS 1. The SFC Considers Authorization of Virtual Asset Futures Exchange Traded Funds (VA Futures ETFs) The SFC would consider authorizing exchange traded funds (ETFs) that obtain exposure to virtual assets (VAs) primarily through futures contracts for public offering in Hong Kong. Unlike before in 2018 NOV where only professional investors are allowed to have exposure to VAs, and having witnessed the rapid evolution of the VA landscape; a Joint Circular in January 2022 between the SFC and the HKMA has announced that licensed and registered intermediaries are allowed to offer VA Futures ETF to retail investors in HK. For reasons that it has been observed that there are meaningful developments in the VA ecosystem recently and some of the initial concerns over VA Futures ETFs have become increasingly manageable and could be adequately addressed with proper safeguards, disclosure and investor education. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the recent developments and innovations, the exposure to spot VAs are still restricted to professional investors only. Whereas VA Futures ETFs seeking for SFC authorization have to meet applicable requirements including the followings: (i) Management companies should demonstrate at least three years’ proven track record with relevant experience. (ii) Only VA futures traded on conventional regulated futures exchanges are allowed currently, only Bitcoin futures and Ether futures on CME are allowed. (iii) The management company is expected to adopt a flexibility investment strategy in the portfolio composition (iv) Disclosure of the product key facts statement is required. (v) Intermediaries are obliged to comply with the applicable requirements under the Code of Conduct when distributing the derivative products. (vi) Investor education should be provided. 2. HKEX Announces the Launch of Core Climate - A New International Carbon Marketplace HKEX announced on 20 OCT 2022, the launch of the Core Climate , a new international carbon marketplace that helps connect capital and resources with climate-related opportunities in Hong Kong, Mainland China, Asia and beyond. The HKEX is committed to provide an easy-access, one-stop, integrated carbon marketplace that includes trading, custody and settlement functions for investors and project owners across the climate value chain, contributing to the realization of global carbon neutrality goals. What is Core Climate: (i) Trading platform : investors can source, purchase, settle and retire voluntary carbon credits in phases. (ii) Trusted marketplace : provides best-in-class market infrastructure and effective, transparent and certified carbon credits and instruments that corporates and investors can use to deliver on their commitment to net zero. (iii) Global community : Core Climate builds Hong Kong’s position as a leading global finance center connecting capital with climate-related products and opportunities in vicinity and around the world. SIGNIFICANCE: HKEX is demonstrating to the world that Hong Kong , as an international financial center, also entrusts with itself the obligation to committing to building a more low-carbon and healthy community to our next generations. As CO-Head of Markets Glenda So said: " We see Core Climate developing to become essential infrastructure, part of our highly connected international ecosystem, matching investment capital with new climate projects, technologies and business models. This will accelerate the shared Net Zero transition and secure a sustainable future for coming generations .” ENFORCEMENT NEWS 3. Court orders Sound Global ( 0967.HK ) Chairman to Purchase Shares from Investors The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has obtained an order in the Court of First Instance against the chairman and executive director of Sound Global Ltd. (Sound Global), Mr. Wen Yibo, to purchase shares held by the other shareholders of the company at a price to be determined by the Court – after he was found to have orchestrated a scheme to falsify the company’s bank balances and fabricated relevant bank statements and balance confirmations. And the Court also issued a disqualification order for 12 years against Wen. As Mr Ashley Alder, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer said: “ The share purchase order represents an important milestone in the SFC’s efforts to protect the investing public from wrongful conduct by management of listed companies and our determination to deploy our full range of regulatory tools to tackle market misconduct and uphold market integrity .” 4. SFC Reprimands and Fines Asia Research & Capital Management Limited HK$1.75 million and Bans its MIC of Compliance The SFC has reprimanded and fined Asia Research & Capital Management Limited (ARCM) HK$1.75 million for failures relating to its non-compliance with the European Union’s short selling reporting requirements (EU Regulation) and to promptly notify the SFC of its material regulatory breaches. The SFC has also banned Mr. Billy Wong Yim Chi, ARCM’s former Head of Compliance and Operations and Manager-In-Charge (MIC) for Compliance for two months from 10 October 2022 to 9 December 2022 for reason that ARCM’s failures to comply with the EU Regulation were directly attributable to Wong’s failure to discharge his duties as ARCM’s MIC for Compliance and a member of its senior management during the material time. The SFC also considers Wong’s conduct fell short of the standard required of him as MIC for Compliance. SIGNIFICANCE: This case seems to be the first instance since the introduction of the MIC regime that a person entrusted with MIC function is sanctioned by the SFC for his incompetence in discharging the duties for the licensed corporation. It conveys a signal to the licensed corporations and the MIC candidates that non-licensed personnel taking the roles of MIC are supposed to assume the same degree of accountability in the eyes of the SFC. 5. Former Account Executive of Fullbright Securities Limited Convicted of Securities Fraud The Eastern Magistrates’ Court has convicted Mr. Danny Fung Kwong Shing, a former account executive of Fulbright Securities Limited, of the offences of engaging in fraud or deception in transactions involving securities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) in a criminal prosecution brought by the SFC. Fung admitted that he had employed a fraudulent scheme of effecting transactions between two accounts, one of his friend and one of his client (without proper authorization from the client), rendering the client a loss and his friend a profit instead. Fung was remanded in custody pending sentence on 27 October 2022 after pleading guilty to all 25 charges; and was later sentenced to two-and-a-half months’ imprisonment following his conviction. 6. Court Convicted Wong King Hoi for Obstruction of SFC's Search Operation The Eastern Magistrates’ Court has convicted Mr. Wong King Hoi (aka「 摸魚 」) after he pleaded guilty to a charge of obstructing employees of the SFC in the execution of a search warrant . When the SFC executed the search warrant at Wong’s residence, Wong allegedly delayed in giving the SFC search team access to his residence and attempted to dispose of four objects including two mobile phones and two notebooks. Wong was remanded in custody pending sentence on 10 November 2022. 7. SFC Bans a Former Licensed Staff of China Galaxy for Violation of Company's Staff Dealing Policy The SFC has banned Ms. Tang Shiyi, a former licensed staff of China Galaxy International Securities (Hong Kong) Co., Limited and China Galaxy International Futures (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (collectively, CGI), from re-entering the industry for 10 months from 29 October 2022 to 28 August 2023. The disciplinary action follows an SFC investigation which found that between July 2019 and February 2021, Tang: (i) failed to obtain CGI’s approval to open and maintain two securities trading accounts with an external brokerage firm and conducted 148 personal trades through the said accounts; (ii) dealt in a stock on CGI’s restricted list; (iii) engaged in day-trading on two occasions, in violation of CGI’s staff dealing policy; (iv) concealed the above securities trading accounts by providing a false and misleading declaration to CGI. The SFC considers that Tang’s conduct, which was willful and dishonest, calls into question her fitness and properness to be a licensed person . SIGNIFICANCE: Tang circumvented CGI’s internal control policies and her conduct prevented CGI from monitoring and reviewing its employees’ trading activities to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. It reminds the licensed persons that taking a frivolous attitude in complying with internal policies will not be construed by the SFC as a lesser breach as compared to violation of prevailing governing rules. For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or call us at (852) 39550277 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk To unsubscribe, please simply reply with “ I don’t like to know more about Compliance ”.

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter for insurance are as follows: ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – June 2025 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. CPD Compliance Reporting Guidelines for 2024/2025 2. IA Conducts Undercover Inspections of Un-Licensing Activities 3. IA Enforces Retrospective Compliance with Broker Companies under SROs Regime 4. IA Bans Two Intermediaries for Fabricating Policies Regulatory News 1. CPD Compliance Reporting Guidelines for 2024/2025 The IA has released comprehensive guidelines in a circular dated 6 June 2025, outlining the Continuing Professional Development (“ CPD ”) compliance reporting procedures for individual licensees and appointing principals for the Assessment Period 2024/2025 (1 August 2024 to 31 July 2025). This newsletter highlights the essential details. Key Deadlines Deadline What to do before the deadline 31 July 2025 Individual licensees must complete their required CPD hours 30 September 2025 Individual licensees must submit CPD Declarations to the IA via Insurance Intermediaries Connect (“ IIC ”) or to their appointing principals 31 October 2025 Appointing principals must report the CPD compliance status of their appointed licensees to the IA How to accessing CPD Information via IIC Individual Licensees : Log into IIC > select "CPD Requirement and Compliance Status" from the left menu to check required CPD hours and compliance status. Appointing Principals : Use IIC Supervisor or Admin accounts to search individual licensees’ CPD status or download CPD Lists under the "Report" option, selecting "CPD hours required for the Assessment Period 2024/2025." Reporting Procedures Individual licensees can submit CPD Declarations in two ways: 1. Direct Submission via IIC: Deadline : 30 September 2025. Before 31 July 2025 : Submit only if CPD hours are fully completed (status: "Yes"). 1 August to 30 September 2025 : Submit regardless of compliance status ("Yes" or "No"). 1 October to 15 November 2025 : Update submissions for those initially reporting shortfalls ("No") with rectified status. 2. Submission via Appointing Principals: Licensees submit CPD Declarations to principals by 30 September 2025 . Principals verify and report to the IA via IIC by 31 October 2025 . CPD Requirements and Penalties Minimum CPD Hours : 15 hours, including 3 hours on "Ethics or Regulations," except for travel agents with restricted scope licenses (3 hours total). Penalties : Shortfall < 8 hours : $600 fine per hour, must be rectified by 31 October 2025, or face a 3-month suspension (continuing until resolved) and potential license revocation. Shortfall ≥ 8 hours : $600 fine per hour, immediate 3-month suspension (continuing until resolved), with possible revocation if unresolved. Non-submission by 30 September 2025 : May trigger an IA investigation for fitness and propriety; false declarations risk license revocation and a 12-month ban. SIGNIFICANCE: The IA notes a rise in CPD compliance from 90% (2021/2022) to 99% (2023/2024) and urges full compliance in 2024/2025 to uphold professional standards in Hong Kong’s insurance market. For further assistance, email cpd@ia.org.hk (general inquiries) or licensing@ia.org.hk (IIC-related matters). Market News 2. IA Conducts Undercover Inspections of Un-Licensing Activities The IA has recently taken proactive measures to protect the interests of policyholders and uphold the integrity of the insurance industry. Ms. Maria Tsui, Head of the Enforcement Department, highlighted the IA’s increased focus on street sales activities in Tsim Sha Tsui, which have raised concerns due to a surge in the number of sales personnel conducting promotional activities in the area. On a weekend in early June 2025, the IA conducted a targeted surveillance operation in Guangdong Road, Tsim Sha Tsui. Undercover officers, acting as mystery shoppers, engaged with sales personnel to gather detailed information about these street sales practices. The findings from this operation have been shared with the relevant insurance companies to address any identified issues and prevent future non-compliance. Passersby witnessed suspected IA’s Undercover Inspections ( Source: Social Media – 3 May 2025 ) IA’s Guidelines related to MCV Unlicensed referrers In May 2024, IA issued Circular which outlines key principles to regulate referral business models for licensed insurance broker companies. This circular focuses particularly on long-term insurance products and clients from Mainland China, referred to as Mainland China Visitors (MCV). Its primary goal is to prevent unlicensed selling practices within the insurance industry. Unlicensed referrers are restricted to introducing potential clients to licensed insurance brokers. They are explicitly prohibited from providing regulated advice, explaining insurance products, or engaging in any sales activities related to insurance products. Such sales activities must only be conducted by individuals or entities holding a valid license from the IA. Undertaking these actions without proper licensing is illegal and carries significant consequences. Violations of these regulations can lead to criminal charges, especially in regions like Mainland China, where insurance laws are strictly enforced. Furthermore, non-compliance with the IA’s guidelines may result in severe disciplinary measures for licensed entities. These measures include, but are not limited to, suspension of licenses, substantial fines, and public reprimands. SIGNIFICANCE: Ms. Maria Tsui emphasized that the Enforcement Department is strengthening its monitoring capabilities to collect intelligence and detect any misconduct or harmful practices that could affect policyholders or tarnish the industry’s reputation. The IA is committed to early intervention, using public education and regulatory actions to deter wrongdoing before it escalates into systemic issues that could lead to severe disciplinary measures or criminal prosecution. In addition to on-the-ground surveillance, the IA is leveraging technology and data tools to monitor online activities and social media platforms for intelligence gathering. Recognizing the value of industry collaboration, the IA is also working closely with industry organizations to encourage the sharing of information and knowledge, further enhancing its monitoring effectiveness. Enforcement News 3. IA Enforces Retrospective Compliance with Broker Companies under SROs Regime On 2 July 2025, the IA has taken disciplinary action against two licensed broker companies for failing to comply with essential regulatory standards aimed at protecting policyholders. These cases highlight the importance of maintaining separate client accounts and securing adequate professional indemnity insurance. These violations breached guidelines under the three Self-Regulatory Organizations (“ SROs ”) and the current Insurance (Financial and Other Requirements for Licensed Insurance Broker Companies) Rules (Cap. 41L) . Case 1: Century Investment Planning Limited Century Investment Planning Limited, a former licensed insurance broker company, received a public reprimand for the following breaches (incident occurred from April 2019 to March 2020): Failure to deposit client monies into a separate account on multiple occasions. Misuse of client funds. Delayed settlement of premiums payable to an insurer. Case 2: Unnamed Broker Company A second broker company was fined $12,000 for inadequate professional indemnity insurance (Incident took place in 2019): Miscalculation of required coverage under the SROs. Resulting in a shortfall of $11.8 million in coverage. No policyholders were harmed in either case, and both companies fully cooperated with the IA during the disciplinary proceedings. SIGNIFICANCE: The IA stresses that segregating client monies and maintaining sufficient professional indemnity insurance are non-negotiable requirements for insurance intermediaries. These safeguards are critical to ensuring policyholder security. The authority has made it clear that failure to comply will lead to proportionate disciplinary measures. 4. IA Bans Two Intermediaries for Favrucating Policies On 12 June 2025, the IA announced the ban of two insurance intermediaries, Ms. LEUNG Wai Mei (“ LEUNG ”) and Ms. Ip Ka Ying (“ IP ”), from acting as insurance intermediaries for 12 months and 21 months respectively. This disciplinary action was taken due to their unethical practice of creating bogus policies to meet sales targets. Details of the Misconduct Ms. LEUNG Wai Mei: Fabricated two policy applications by misusing a client’s personal information. She certified a fake proof of identity for her son and attempted to conceal her actions by changing her correspondence address. Ms. IP Ka Ying: Fabricated eight policy applications using personal details from clients and friends. Additionally, she fraudulently accepted exclusions of personal liabilities related to premises owned by two applicants. The IA has described these actions as "iniquitous and premeditated," highlighting that such misconduct severely damages the trust and professionalism expected of insurance intermediaries. SIGNIFICANCE: The IA stresses that segregating client monies and maintaining sufficient professional indemnity insurance are non-negotiable requirements for insurance intermediaries. These safeguards are critical to ensuring policyholder security. The authority has made it clear that failure to comply will lead to proportionate disciplinary measures. [End of ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – June 2025] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: ComplianceOne Newsletter – December 2022 ComplianceOne Newsletter – December 2022 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. Asia's First Crypto Asset ETFs were launched on HKEX 2. SFC reminds the Risks associated with Unregulated Virtual Asset Platform 3. SFC revises Business and Risk Management Questionnaire (BRMQ) 4. SFC to launch investor identification regime (HKIDR) in March 2023 5. MSCI's Report to reveal trends in ESG & Climate for 2023 6. SFC suspends Wang Pei Yi for 10 months for making false declarations 7. SFC fines and suspends Chung Tung Sau for seven months for breach of conflicts of interest 8. SFC bans Sun Yiding eight months for circumvention of personal dealings without approval from employer 9. SFC reprimands and fines Guosen Securities (HK) Brokerage Company, Limited $2.8 million over regulatory breaches MARKET NEWS 1. Asia's First Crypto Asset ETFs were launched on HKEX CSOP Asset Management Limited (“CSOP”) launched the CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETF ( 3066.HK ) and CSOP Ether Futures ETF ( 3036.HK ) on 16 December 2022 which were then traded on the HKEX; the strategy of which was to capture the performance of the actively traded Bitcoin and Ether futures in CME which amount up to 39% and 17% of the total market cap respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The launch of the two ETFs was marking the first time Asian retail investors can have access to this type of virtual assets with a minimum investment of USD100 traded through the traditional brokerage accounts. The approval from the SFC and the HKEX of two new ETFs based on the CME Bitcoin and Ether futures was an importance benchmark in the development of digital asset trading and an unprecedented step forward to accommodate the robust growth and vehement client demand for exposure to Bitcoins and Ethers, yet traded under highly regulated exchanges like CME where protection of investors can be assured. 2. SFC reminds the Risks associated with Unregulated Virtual Asset Platform The SFC wishes to remind investors of the risks associated with virtual asset (VA) platforms offering VA “ deposits ”, “ savings ”, “ earnings ” or “ staking ” services (VA Arrangements) to investors in Hong Kong in light of their continued prevalence. The SFC has observed that some of these platforms may offer a high “interest rate” on VA “deposits” or a daily generation of additional VA at a guaranteed or fixed rate to investors, and there are significant risks associated with investing in these types of VA Arrangements. Investors may suffer significant or even total loss, especially in the event of fraud or collapse of a VA platform. The SFC has figured out some key features investors have to be aware of: (i) Some VA Arrangements are commonly labelled as “deposits” or “savings” products, while they are NOT regulated and are not the same as ordinary bank deposits; and investors are not ensured with any protection; (ii) A vast majority of VA platforms offering VA Arrangements are unregulated; (iii) VA is exposed to heightened risks like insufficient liquidity, high price volatility or fraud, which may lose the entire value; (iv) Some VA Arrangements could amount to a collective investment scheme (CIS) as defined under the SFO, yet they are not authorized CIS per se and may be highly risky to investors. SIGNIFICANCE: On one hand, the HKSAR Government is keen on developing HK as an international financial hub for virtual asset trading; while on the other hand, the governing regime is still on the stage of coping and catch up with the inherent ever-changing and volatile market scenarios of the trading platforms or channels of these VA products. Currently, most of the VA or VA platforms are not yet regulated to ensure sufficient protection to investors at large which can justify the external potential regulatory risks incurred. The HKSAR Government should endeavour to maintain a balance in launching its financial policies. 3. SFC revises the Business and Risk Management Questionnaire (BRMQ) The SFC published a revised Business and Risk Management Questionnaire (BRMQ) on 23 Dec 2022 for licensed corporations (LCs) and associated entities (AEs). The BRMQ is a supervisory tool adopted by the SFC to collect additional data and information on a variety of functions and business activities to enhance the effectiveness of its risk-based supervision amid the rapidly changing operation and business environment. It is noted that many new questions are incorporated to collect more granular clients and transaction data with focus on analyzing the issues on money laundering and internal risk controls. SIGNIFICANCE: This Circular is published with an aim to allow sufficient preparation time for LCs and AEs, thus the revised BRMQ would be used for financial years ending on or after 30 November 2023. LCs and AEs are urged to review and familiarise themselves with the revised questionnaires, and start gathering, compiling the required information and implementing the system enhancement whatever deemed necessary. One crucial implication of the BRMQ is used as an indicative checklist, though not exhaustive, of the required standards expected by the SFC. It serves as an operational guideline with step by step for the LCs to prepare themselves the details of how the requirements in the guidelines are implemented in real operational routines. 4. SFC to launch investor identification regime (HKIDR) in March 2023 The SFC announced on 12 Dec 2022 that the investor identification regime (HKIDR) for the securities market in Hong Kong will finally be launched on 20 March 2023. Ever since the consultation in 2021, the SFC has been closely monitoring the readiness of the licensed corporations (“LC”) in implementing the HKIDR. The survey and recent rehearsals indicate that some intermediaries may need more time to obtain the client consent which is a prerequisite for the HKIDR to authorize the LC to collect, store and process the personal data of the underlying clients. Investors are also reminded to respond to their relevant brokers in order to facilitate the process. As Mr Ashley Alder, former CEO of the SFC, has said: “The launch of the investor identification regime will be a significant milestone in Hong Kong’s securities market ”. The HKIDR enables more effective market surveillance, reinforce market integrity and promote confidence of the investors, which are the indispensable pillar for Hong Kong as an international financial centre. 5. MSCI's Report to reveal trends in ESG & Climate for 2023 In the MSCI ‘s 11th annual ESG & Climate Trends to Watch Report , it is stated that listed companies will deplete their share of the global emissions budget for limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C by December 2026. Researchers explained in the ESG & Climate Trends to Watch Report that the ongoing war in Ukraine and record levels of inflation globally may limit near-term pressure to reduce global greenhouse-gas emissions as governments around the world are prioritizing energy security and affordability on their to-do-list. However, MSCI ESG data also reveals that major power companies are keeping their eyes on longer-term decarbonization trends and expanding deployment of renewables. Amid the above changes, investors continue to evaluate how the climate crisis will impact their portfolio in 2023. As Meggin Thwing Eastman, Managing Director and Global ESG Editorial Director at MSCI, has said: “ ESG risk is financial risk , and the ESG and climate research showcased in today’s report was conducted to support investor needs to synthesize previously unseen risks and incentivize companies to better manage both emerging issues and the longstanding, expansive threat of the climate crisis. ” SIGNIFICANCE: It is expected that ESG and climate-related risks remain and continue to remain as dominant factors of consideration for investors in constructing their portfolios. Apart from diverting resources to comply with the EGS standards which definitely incurs additional costs, it is still of paramount importance for companies to explore business opportunities upon this decarbonization transition; or otherwise, they will not be able to weather the storm in this global trend. ENFORCEMENT NEWS 6. SFC suspends Wang Pei Yi for 10 months for making false declarations The SFC has suspended Ms Wang Pei Yi, a former licensed representative of SinoPac Securities (Asia) Limited (SinoPac), for 10 months for making false declaration in the account opening forms of three corporate clients between June 2015 and April 2017. Wang had falsely declared that she had met and witnessed the signing of forms of the clients; and provided them with relevant risk disclosure statements. Her failure to take all reasonable steps to establish the true and full identity of the clients definitely violated the principles to act honestly, with care and diligence, and best interest of the clients themselves. 7. SFC fines and suspends Chung Tung Sau for seven months for breach of conflicts of interest The SFC has suspended Mr Chung Tung Sau, a former licensed representative of Quam Securities Company Limited (Quam), for seven months from 15 and fined him $60,000. It was found that between 1 and 11 August 2017 Chung had traded in the shares of a listed company (Company A) for himself while executing a client’s good-till-cancel buy order for the same shares (GTC Order). Chung deliberately arranged matched trades between the GTC orders of the client and his own selling orders, resulting in a profit of approximately $60,000 from these transactions. The SFC considers Chung’s conduct has called into questions his fitness and properness as a licensed person, in particular, his failure to: (i) take reasonable step to avoid the conflicts of interests between himself and the client; (ii) comply with the staff dealing policy of Quam; (iii) execute the GTC Order in best available price for the client. 8. SFC bans Sun Yiding eight months for circumvention of personal dealings without approval from employer The SFC has prohibited Ms Sun Yiding from re-entering the industry for eight months from 15 December 2022 to 14 August 2023. It was found in an investigation that between July 2019 and July 2020, Sun failed to obtain her then employer’s approval to open a securities trading account with an external brokerage firm and conducted 829 personal trades in the account unbeknownst to it. She also traded in three stocks on her then employer’s restricted list and sold certain stocks within 30 days of purchase without its pre-approval. SIGNIFICANCE: The same scenario as the case before, the SFC has demonstrated to the licensed persons that "fitness and properness" remain as crucial elements in assessing the integrity of a licensed person; and bear the same material weight as any breach of other market misconducts. 9. SFC reprimands and fines Guosen Securities (HK) Brokerage Company, Limited $2.8 million over regulatory breaches The SFC has reprimanded and fined Guosen Securities (HK) Brokerage Company, Limited (Guosen) $2.8 million for regulatory breaches in relation to the handling of client assets and the provision of client account statements. The SFC’s investigation found that: (i) between 1 January 2021 and 7 March 2021, Guosen relied on expired standing authority of 1,009 clients to obtain financial accommodation by repledging their securities collateral with a bank as collateral; (ii) from May 2020 to November 2020, Guosen had provided monthly statements with incomplete and incorrect information to 930 clients. Guosen’s failures constitute breaches of the Securities and Futures (Client Securities) Rules (CSR), the Securities and Futures (Contract Notes, Statement of Account and Receipts) Rules (CNR) and the Code of Conduct. SIGNIFICANCE The case is an excellent example of lack of internal controls and operation deficiency in fulfilling the annual routines in a timely manner. It also reveals the facts that some staff may be incompetent in fulfilling their obligations for providing statements which should be precisely reconciled. For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or call us at (852) 39550277 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk To unsubscribe, please simply reply with “ I don’t like to know more about Compliance ”.

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: ComplianceOne Newsletter - February 2024 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. SFC welcomes government budget measures 2. SFC reminds transitional arrangement for public VATP application period has ended on 29 February 2024 3. SFC reprimands and fines PICC Asset Management (Hong Kong) Company Limited $2.8 million for fund management failures 4. SFC bans Lam Ching Chiu and Wong Siu Fung for five years for bribery offences 5. SFC secures first criminal conviction of securities fraud via illegal short selling MARKET NEWS 1.SFC welcomes government budget measures On 28 Feb 2024, the SFC announced that its welcome note to the new government budget 2024-2025. Mr. Tim Lui, Chairman of the SFC, said: “ The proposed initiatives will boost Hong Kong’ s competitiveness as a global asset and wealth management hub and fund-raising centre. ” And he further added that: “ Building on a decade of success for our mutual market access schemes, we will continue to deepen connectivity with Mainland markets, especially the Greater Bay Area, as well as consolidate Hong Kong’ s position as a leading offshore renminbi hub and a premier risk management centre. ” On the operation side, Ms Julia Leung, Chief Executive Officer of the SFC also said: “ We will work closely with HKEX to improve the market microstructure, reduce transaction costs and enhance market efficiency. ” It is worth noting that the SFC shares the view of the importance of reducing transaction costs, the minimum bid-ask spread in stock trading which are conducive to improving liquidity in the market. There are also other cost-saving measures and incentives like the extension of the Grant Scheme for Open-ended Fund Companies and Real Estate Investment Trust (REITS), stamp duty waiver for REITS etc. SIGNIFICANCE: It is not hard to notice that a regulatory body as SFC also publicly announces its support to the government even in economic measures intended to serve as catalyst to bolster the economy; the HKSAR government is harnessing strengths and supports from all side to consolidating financial resilience in Hong Kong. 2. SFC reminds transitional arrangement for public VATP application period has ended on 29 February 2024 The SFC announced a reminder note on 1 March 2024 of the deadline (29 February) for virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) to submit licence applications; and those existing VATPs which do NOT submit applications would have to close down their business by 31 May 2024 pursuant to the transitional arrangement. Investors dealing with VATPs operating in Hong Kong which are not on the “List of licensed virtual asset trading platforms” or on the “List of virtual asset trading platform applicants” are urged to close their accounts with these VATPs or transfer to SFC-licensed VATPs for trading virtual assets. The SFC further reminds the public that the applications submitted by applicants on the “List of virtual asset trading platform applicants” are still being processed and they may – or may not – be approved . Hence, trading on these platforms carries a risk. From the SFC’s List of virtual asset trading platforms up to 1 March 2024, there are 24 applicants on the list, and it is odd that the popular platforms like Coinbase and Kraken are not on the list of 24 applicants. Besides, two applicants - Ammbr, BitHarbour – withdrew their applications and one application from Meex was returned by the SFC. It is also noted that Huobi HK re-submitted its application on 26 February 2024. SIGNIFICANCE: With the JPEX scam still fresh in mind, the SFC strongly urges investors to trade virtual assets only on SFC-licensed VATPs because they may expose themselves to unprotected risk on unlicensed platforms. ENFORCEMENT NEWS 3. SFC reprimands and fines PICC Asset Management (Hong Kong) Company Limited $2.8 million for fund management failures On 5 February 2024, the SFC made an announcement to reprimand and fined PICC Asset Management (Hong Kong) Company Limited (PICC) $2.8 million over its failures to discharge duties as the manager of a Cayman-incorporated fund between May 2018 and May 2020. From investigation of the SFC, it was found that PICC had failed to: (i) properly manage the fund to ensure its investments were in line with the stated investment objectives and restrictions; (ii) implement adequate and effective internal controls to manage the fund from any over-concentration risks of non-compliance in just three stocks; and (iii) supervise the designated investment manager (“IM”) in his investment activities of the fund. SIGNIFICANCE: It is ironical indeed that the fund’ s investment objective was to achieve capital preservation and steady capital appreciation through primarily investing in a diversified portfolio of equity securities; yet what the IM had been doing was to concentrate on a few stocks and not to comply with the stop loss procedures to preserve the capital! The IM was like acting unleashed from the mandate restrictions of the fund at all. 4. SFC bans Lam Ching Chiu and Wong Siu Fung for five years for bribery offences The SFC made an announcement on 6 February 2024 that Mr Lam Ching Chiu and Mr Wong Siu Fung, both former licensed representatives of Nerico Brothers Limited, from re-entering the industry for five years starting from 6 February 2024 following their criminal convictions of bribery offences. Lam and Wong were found guilty in August 2022 at the District Court of paying the then chief executive officer (CEO) of Hong Kong Financial Engineering Company Limited (HKFECL) bribes in relation to utilising a computerised algorithmic programme used for futures trading from late 2014 to early 2015. It was found that the CEO asked Lam and Wong for commission for each profitable transactions through the use of the trading programme where both of them were not alerted if the practices were known or acceptable to HKFECL. SIGNIFICANCE: In deciding the sanctions, the SFC considered that Lam and Wong were not fit and proper persons to be licensed to carry on regulated activities due to their criminal convictions. They were both sentenced to imprisonment, with suspension for two years. 5. SFC secures first criminal conviction of securities fraud via illegal short selling The Eastern Magistrates’ Court on 27 February 2024 convicted Ms Christine Yeung Tak Sum guilty of securities fraud involving illegal short selling in proceedings brought by the SFC. The case was found that Yeung submitted a settlement instruction form to her broker Aristo Securities Limited pretending she had 15 million shares in Aurum Pacific (China) Group Limited (Aurum) in another brokerage firm, and then sold the share which she did not have. After illegal short-selling Aurum shares, she proceeded to buy back the same quantity of shares at a lower price to cover her short-sold positions within the same day, making an illicit profit of about HKD602,600. SIGNIFICANCE: Intermediaries should be aware of their obligation to implement and maintain appropriate measures to comply with the short selling requirements and to be mindful of red flags indicating illegal short selling by its clients, especially clients with no sound rationale for not executing the sell instructions directly through their original brokers. For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter for insurance are as follows: ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – Feb 2025 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: IA to Facilitate the Caps on Commission Rates Hong Kong to License Mainland Insurers for Greater Bay Area Retirement Plans Targeting Middle-Income Residents ICAC investigates puppet insurance agent case involving HK$52 million IA News Updates 1. IA to Facilitate the Caps on Commission Rates The Insurance Authority ( IA ) issued a Practice Note to address concerns that overly optimistic benefit illustrations for participating life insurance policies, influenced by aggressive investment assumptions, could mislead consumers. Under existing guidelines (GL16 and GL28), insurers must provide transparent, non-misleading projections of policy returns, balancing guaranteed and non-guaranteed benefits. The update, effective 1 July 2025 , mandates illustration rate caps of 6.0% for HKD-denominated policies and 6.5% for other currencies on projected surrender values (Customers’ IRR) to curb unrealistic expectations. These caps apply to Customers' IRR on projected surrender values across all payment modes, policy terms, and scenarios (base, optimistic, pessimistic). Illustration rate caps 6.0% for products denominated in Hong Kong Dollar (HKD). 6.5% for products denominated in other currencies. If the underlying IRR is below the cap, insurers must use the actual IRR (per best estimates under GL28). Caps do not limit underlying investment assumptions but guide illustration realism. Exemption: Caps do not apply to re-illustrations of in-force policies, but re-illustrations must not be used for aggressive sales tactics. SIGNIFICANCE: This Practice Note reflects a proactive regulatory stance to balance innovation, competition, and consumer trust in Hong Kong’s insurance sector. Insurers should begin preparing now to ensure compliance by July 2025. And the Consumers benefit from clearer, more reliable projections, fostering informed decisions and aligning with the principle of "treating customers fairly." 2. Hong Kong to License Mainland Insurers for Greater Bay Area Retirement Plans Targeting Middle-Income Residents The Insurance Authority ( IA ) plans to introduce new service providers, primarily large mainland Chinese insurers, to offer integrated retirement and elderly care insurance products targeting middle-class residents seeking to retire in the Greater Bay Area (GBA). This initiative, led by Mr Marty Lui Yu-kwok, the IA’s Executive Director for Long-term Business, aims to address growing demand from Hong Kong residents for northbound retirement options, driven by trends in cross-border consumption and aging populations. The proposed insurance products would provide one-stop solutions covering accommodation, healthcare, and other elderly care services in mainland China. These providers, which currently lack Hong Kong licenses, are expected to bring specialized expertise and value to the local market. The IA aims to issue licenses by the end of 2024, with product launches following shortly after. The target demographic includes middle-income earners with monthly salaries between HK$30,000-50,000, reflecting demand for affordable, high-quality retirement options in the GBA. This move aligns with broader regional integration efforts and responds to challenges posed by Hong Kong’s aging population and high local elderly care costs. The IA emphasizes collaboration with mainland regulators to ensure compliance and consumer protection. Market News 3. ICAC investigates puppet insurance agent case involving HK$52 million The Independent Commission Against Corruption (“ ICAC ”) investigated a corruption complaint involving "puppet insurance agents," leading to the conviction of a former insurance branch manager and 10 puppet agents for conspiracy to defraud and money laundering. Case Details: Between 2016 and 2020, the former branch manager of an insurance company recruited individuals to act as puppet insurance agents for two insurance companies. The insurance companies approved these 478 policy applications and paid commissions, bonuses, and allowances totaling over 52 million HKD to the defendants—exceeding 22 million HKD from one company and 29 million HKD from the other. Related insurance policies were high-commission products, and the majority lapsed due to non-payment of premiums. On 11 February 2025, the District Court sentenced the former branch manager to 46 months’ imprisonment. The 10 puppet agents received prison terms ranging from 11 to 22 months. SIGNIFICANCE: The convictions demonstrate the serious legal consequences for individuals involved in fraudulent activities within the insurance industry. The prison sentences imposed reflect the severity of the offenses and serve as a warning to others against engaging in similar misconduct. [End of ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter –February 2025] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter for insurance are as follows: ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – November 2025 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: REGULATORY UPDATES IA Issues Circular on Reference Checking Schemes for Licensed Insurance Intermediaries ENFORCEMENT NEWS IA Imposes Restrictive License Conditions on Mighty Divine Insurance Brokers Limited Associated with Prince Group (太子集團) ICAC Secures Jail Sentences for Last Batch of Defendants in $52 Million Dummy Agents Commissions Fraud ICAC Issues Arrest Warrants for Two Individuals Implicated in $3 Million Insurance Commissions Fraud Regulatory News 1. IA Issues Circular on Reference Checking Schemes for Licensed Insurance Intermediaries On 20 November 2025, IA Issues further Circular on the Reference Checking Scheme (the “ Scheme ”) for Licensed Insurance Intermediaries. Addressing the “rolling bad apples” phenomenon “One bad apple spoils the whole barrel” so the old adage goes. In the context of the Scheme, the phenomenon of “rolling bad apples” refer to licensed individuals attempt to evade the consequences of past misconduct by moving principals without proper disclosure. To address the issue of “rolling bad apples”, the Scheme was launched by the Hong Kong Federation of Insurers (“ HKFI ”) by its circular dated 5 July 2025 to be used by its members which are authorized insurers carrying on long-term business from 1 September 2024 onwards. The IA then issued the Circular on 5 July 2024 to endorse and support the Scheme. The Scheme then expanded in Phase 2, jointly launched by the HKFI, the Hong Kong Confederation of Insurance Brokers (“ CIB ”) and Professional Insurance Brokers Association (“ PIBA ”), covers all licensed long-term individual intermediaries to protect policyholders, maintain market confidence, and prevent misconduct from spreading. Effective Date With effect from 1 January 2026 , the Scheme will be expanded to cover all appointment of all individuals licensed intermediaries carrying on long term insurance business. Non-compliance may lead to supervisory scrutiny or disciplinary action by the IA. Scope and Application Applies to appointments of prospective intermediaries (the “ Candidates ”), including: licensed individual insurance agents; technical representatives (agent); or technical representatives (broker) (collective as “ TRs ”); for regulated activities in long-term business . As a Recruiting Principal, conduct reference checks on candidates with past 7 years of relevant experience. Check only the THREE most recent appointments if multiple. Excludes agencies that are authorized institutions under Banking Ordinance (potential integration with banking scheme ongoing). Summary of the Scheme Making a Reference Checking Request (as Recruiting Principal) Before appointing for long term activities, conduct reference checks on THREE most recent appointments within Past 7 years. · Use Annex 1A template to request info from responding principals. · Obtain written consent from candidates via Annex 2A form , authorizing checks, disclosure, and exempting contractual limits. If candidates refuse to provide consent or withdrawn the provided consent, should NOT appoint. For group companies, one entity can conduct checks for reliance, but each remains accountable with access to results. Responding to a Reference Checking Request (as Responding Principal) Upon received the Reference Checking Request from Recruiting Principal: · Complete and return info within 15 days; · If delayed, send interim reply with reason and expected final (max 2 months , exceptional only, approved by * KPIM/RO or delegate). *KPIM - key person in control function for intermediary management; RO - Responsible Officer. After submitting the first round of reference checking requests, respond to any further clarification requests within 15 days, if applicable. Recruiting Principal may assume that no further clarification to be provided by Responding Principal. Assessment by the Recruiting Principal (as Recruiting Principal) Discretion in Decisions : Recruiting principal has full discretion to appoint based on all info, including references. Evaluate adverse info considering nature, timing, explanations, and recurrence risk. Responding principals may voluntarily add material facts. Opportunity to Be Heard : For fairness, provide candidates chance for representations if adverse info may block appointment; share reference copy. No need to reopen investigations or seek more from responders. Proceeding with Adverse Records : Document assessment and justification for appointing despite issues; endorsed by KPIM/RO. Ongoing Assessment : If Responding Principal declare further information to provide, the reference process may consider complete once the Recruiting Principal assesses available information and decides on appointment ( must document the justification with KPIM/RO endorsement ). Pre-Appointment & Post-Appointment (as Recruiting Principal) Pre-Appointment If the Recruiting Principal decides to appoint despite adverse records from reference checks, they must document the assessment and justification, which requires endorsement by KPIM/RO. Post-Appointment If additional information arrives after appointment, the Recruiting Principal has full discretion to use it for ongoing evaluation, including potential actions like terminate the appointed candidate. Records and Communications (All Principals engaging Long-term business) Record Keeping For Insurance Broker Company engaging Long-Term Business: · Maintain records of resigned TRs for at least 7 years (or per internal policy, not longer than necessary under PDPO). · For unsuccessful application, retain max 2 years unless reason or consent. IIC Centralized Contact Database IA will maintain centralized contact database contain all participating principals via IA’s e-portal - Insurance Intermediaries Connect (“ IIC ”). As a safeguard, responding principals are not required to reply to reference check requests unless sent from the valid designated email address recorded in the contact database. Reference Checking Schemes Materials The Circular attached with relevant materials including: I. Main Paper – Details of the Schemes and Procedures II. Annex 1A – Template III. Annex 2A – Consent Form IV. FAQ for Licensed Entities V. FAQ for Licensed Individuals Attachment: Reference Checking Schemes Materials 附件: 保險中介人背景查核計劃資料 SIGNIFICANCE: This Scheme reinforces the IA's commitment to maintaining high standards of conduct and integrity in Hong Kong's insurance sector by preventing the recirculation of unfit intermediaries. By mandating structured reference checks, it enhances policyholder protection, reduces risks of misconduct, and promotes a more transparent and accountable industry. Insurers and intermediaries should review their hiring processes promptly to ensure compliance, as this could mitigate potential regulatory risks and foster greater trust in the market. Enforcement News 2. IA Imposes Restrictive License Conditions on Mighty Divine Insurance Brokers Limited Associated with Prince Group (太子集團) The Prince Group (太子集團) founded by Chen Zhi (陳志), has been implicated in operating telecom fraud parks in Cambodia, with Chen Zhi facing US prosecution and sanctions, including the freezing of approximately HK$120 billion in Bitcoin assets. On 28 October 2025, IA Imposes Restrictive License Conditions on Mighty Divine Insurance Brokers Limited (“ Mighty Divine ”) - Associate Company with Prince Group. The conditions prohibit the company from conducting, or representing itself as conducting, any regulated activities as defined under the Insurance Ordinance (Cap. 41) . Details of the Licensed Corporate: Name (EN) Mighty Divine Insurance Brokers Limited Name (CN) 美迪保險經紀有限公司 Licence No. FB1329 License Type Insurance Broker Company Line(s) of Business General & Long Term Business (excluding Linked Long Term Business) Business Address FLAT/RM 803, 8/F, 68 KIMBERLEY ROAD, TSIM SHA TSUI, KL Responsible Officer(s) Nill (as of 28 Oct 2025) For more details, please refer to Register of Licensed Insurance Intermediaries Conditions of the License 1) The licensee is restricted from carrying on, or holding out to carry on, any regulated activities under the Insurance Ordinance (Cap. 41) (“IO”); 2) Without prejudice to the generality of condition (1) above, and subject to condition (3) below, the licensee shall not receive, hold, or deal with any monies as specified in section 71(2) of the IO (i.e. (a) monies received by the company from or on behalf of a policy holder or potential policy holder for or on account of an insurer in connection with a contract of insurance; and (b) monies received by the company from or on behalf of an insurer for or on account of a policy holder or potential policy holder.) (“Client Monies”); and 3) The licensee may be involved in arranging the transfer, remittance or payment of, or otherwise deal with, Client Monies in accordance with the requirements under the IO and the Insurance (Financial and Other Requirements for Licensed Insurance Broker Companies) Rules (Cap. 41L), provided that (i) it acts in compliance with all applicable laws and regulatory requirements; and (ii) it has obtained the prior written consent of the Insurance Authority. 3. ICAC Secures Jail Sentences for Last Batch of Defendants in $52 Million Dummy Agents Commissions Fraud On 21 November 2025, the Hong Kong District Court sentenced the final six defendants in a major corruption case investigated by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (“ ICAC ”), involving a $52 million fraud scheme (the ” Scheme ”) orchestrated through dummy insurance agents at: FWD Life Insurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (富衛人壽保險(百慕達)有限公司) (“ FWD ”); and Sun Life Hong Kong Limited (香港永明金融有限公司) (“ Sun Life ”). Case Summary The scheme, masterminded by LO Yin-wa (“ LO ”), a former FWD branch manager who was earlier sentenced to 46 months' imprisonment, involved recruiting dummy agents who falsely represented themselves as handlers of 478 high-commission insurance policies between February 2016 and November 2020. This deception led to the release of over $52 million in commissions, incentives, bonuses, and allowances, most of which were funneled back to LO through laundered bank accounts. The majority of the policies lapsed due to non-payment of subsequent premiums. FWD and Sun Life provided full cooperation during the ICAC investigation, which stemmed from a corruption complaint. Enforcement Act and Court Order The last six defendants, aged 25 to 39 and acting as purported insurance agents were convicted or pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to deal with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offense, with sentences ranged from 12 to 21 months' imprisonment. i. LEUNG Tsz-wing (梁紫穎) ii. MO Wing-han (毛詠嫻) iii. WOO Kin-leung (胡健良) Entered Guilty Pleas iv. LO Nga-wing (羅雅穎) v. NGAN Tsz-ting (顏梓定) vi. KONG Tsz-ying (江梓瑩) Convicted After Trial A total of 17 defendants faced 20 charges in the case, with 10 other dummy agents previously sentenced to terms ranging from 11 to 22 months. SIGNIFICANCE: The ICAC continues to prioritize integrity in the insurance sector, offering training and resources like the Corruption Prevention Guide for Insurance Companies to mitigate such risks. The judge also reprimanded the defendants for breaching professional conduct standards, noting they were lured into the offenses by the main culprit. This case highlights the severe consequences of integrity breaches in the insurance industry, emphasizing the need for robust internal controls, agent verification processes, and anti-fraud measures to prevent dummy agent schemes that erode public trust and cause financial harm. 4. ICAC Issues Arrest Warrants for Two Individuals Implicated in $3 Million Insurance Commissions Fraud The ICAC has issued arrest warrants for NG Ho-lun (吳浩麟) (“ NG ”) and Kuzca CHIK Sin-deon, formerly known as Pan CHIK Ka-tung (戚善惇, 前稱戚加彤) (“ CHIK ”), two key figures in an alleged insurance fraud scheme that defrauded: Sun Life Hong Kong Limited (香港永明金融有限公司) (“ Sun Life ”); and China Taiping Life Insurance (Hong Kong) Company Limited (中國太平人壽保險(香港)有限公司) (“ Taiping Life ”); of approximately $3 million in commissions, bonuses, and allowances through bogus policies and false representations. Case Summary The case, which involves recruiting family members, friends, and police officers as dummy agents and policyholders, stems from corruption allegations and has led to charges against eight individuals total, with six already charged and appearing in court. On 6 November 2025, the case against the six charged defendants were transferred from the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts to the District Court for plea on 27 November 2025. The defendants face 21 charges. See below table for the Six Charged Defendants Details: Role/Relationship Name Police Sergeant LAM Hin-ho (林顯豪) LAM Hin-ho’s brother LAM Chun-pong (林振邦) LAM Hin-ho’s sister-in-law YU Xiaodan (余曉丹) LAM Hin-ho’s friend LAU Chun-yee, formerly known as LAU Man-yee (劉臻頤, 前稱劉敏儀) Solicitor Osbert HUI Yee (許懿) Police Constable SZE Hong-chak (施匡澤) For more details of the case, please refer to Topic 4 of ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – October 2025 Details of Two Wanted Individuals Name Former Positions Role in Fraud Fraud Conducted NG Ho-lun Regional Director of Sun Life; Senior Branch Manager of Taiping Life Central role in orchestrating the fraud Recruited individuals (including LAM Hin-ho’s family, friends, and police colleagues) as dummy downline agents and policyholders; Took out 20 insurance policies, paying premiums while falsely claiming they were settled by genuine policyholders; Ensured false claims of agent interviews; Conspired with LAM Hin-ho and LAU Chun-yee to create false academic qualifications for LAU's recruitment. Kuzca CHIK Sin-deon (formerly Pan CHIK Ka-tung) Insurance Agent of Sun Life Participated in recruitment and posed as a dummy agent Contributed to false representations to insurers; Deceived insurers into believing applications were legitimate and interviews occurred, leading to fraudulent commissions. SIGNIFICANCE: This case underscores the vulnerabilities in the insurance sector to internal fraud schemes involving unlicensed or dummy intermediaries, particularly when intertwined with public servants like police officers, potentially eroding public trust in both law enforcement and financial institutions. The ICAC's proactive investigation and pursuit of fugitives highlight the importance of robust verification processes for policy applications, agent qualifications, and commission payouts to prevent such exploitation. Insurers are urged to enhance anti-fraud measures, including cross-verification of applicant interviews and premium sources, while collaborating with regulators to maintain industry integrity and protect policyholders from systemic risks. [End of ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – November2025] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1605, 16/F, West Tower, Shun Tak Centre,168-200 Connaught Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

香港海關於2024年1月2日成功偵破一宗涉及未註冊鑽石交易的案件，並拘捕了涉案公司的一名董事。On 2 January 2024, Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (the “Customs”) successfully uncovered a case involving unregistered diamond trading and arrested the involved director. 香港海關偵破未註冊鑽石交易案件 一名公司董事被捕 香港海關於2024年1月2日成功偵破一宗涉及未註冊鑽石交易的案件，並拘捕了涉案公司的一名董事。該公司未經註冊進行多宗金額逾12萬港元的鑽石交易，這不僅違反了香港的法律規定，也暴露出一些貴金屬及寶石業務經營者對監管規範的忽視。 根據香港海關的報告，該公司在沒有依照《打擊洗錢及恐怖分子資金籌集條例》所要求的註冊情況下，進行了數宗總額超過12萬港元的鑽石交易。所有在香港從事貴金屬及寶石交易的商業活動，如果涉及12萬港元或以上的交易金額（無論是現金還是非現金支付），均需向海關註冊。 涉及的董事被捕後，已獲准保釋，但案件仍在進一步調查中。海關強調，任何未註冊的貴金屬及寶石交易商，無論其業務規模大小，都不應忽視這一法律要求。根據法律規定，未註冊進行大額交易者將面臨最高10萬元港幣罰款及最多6個月監禁的處罰。 海關提醒所有貴金屬及寶石交易商，註冊過渡期已經結束，所有業務必須在獲得註冊後才能進行金額為12萬港元或以上的交易。如果您不確定是否需要註冊或如何進行註冊，建議儘早聯繫專業的合規顧問，避免因違法交易而承擔高額罰款和刑事責任。 《貴金屬及寶石交易商監管制度》簡介 所有涉及貴金屬和寶石業務的公司和個人，必須遵守香港特區政府於2023年4月1日實施的新規範，即《貴金屬及寶石交易商監管制度》。該制度要求所有在香港經營貴金屬及寶石交易，並進行12萬港元以上交易的商家必須註冊，並接受海關的監管。 註冊類別 交易方式 A類註冊人 非現金交易 B類註冊人 現金交易及非現金交易 ** 更多關於貴金屬及寶石交易商註冊的資訊，請參考 天匯合規網站 上的詳細指引 ** 根據《打擊洗錢及恐怖分子資金籌集條例》（第615章）的要求，未經註冊的交易不僅涉及法律風險，還可能引發洗錢和恐怖分子資金籌集等金融犯罪問題。所有貴金屬及寶石交易商在進行大額交易前，必須先向香港海關註冊，以確保合規經營。 為什麼需要監管？ 貴金屬和寶石，尤其是鑽石、金、銀等高價值商品，往往成為洗錢、資金籌集和其他非法活動的工具。由於這些交易通常金額巨大且難以追蹤，若缺乏有效的監管，將容易成為金融犯罪的溫床。這一註冊制度旨在提高對貴金屬和寶石交易的監管透明度，確保該行業避免用作洗錢、資金籌集等非法活動的渠道。 如您有任何疑問，或需要協助完成註冊過程，請隨時 聯繫我們 。我們提供專業的合規顧問服務，幫助您輕鬆應對監管要求。 此外，參加 天匯合規網上持續培訓平台 – Thinkific 提供的貴金屬及寶石交易商（”DPMS”）線上培訓課程，了解更多貴金屬及寶石業務經營的合規知識。 The Customs Reveal another Unregistered Diamond Trading Case On 2 January 2024, Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (the “Customs”) successfully uncovered a case involving unregistered diamond trading and arrested the involved director. The company had conducted multiple transactions exceeding HK$120,000 in diamond sales without the required registration, violating Hong Kong’s legal regulations and highlighting the negligence of some precious metals and gemstone traders regarding the regulatory framework. According to the Customs, the company carried out several transactions exceeding HK$120,000 in total, without registering as required by the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (“AMLO”) (Cap. 615). All businesses engaging in precious metals and gemstone transactions in Hong Kong involving amounts of HK$120,000 or more (whether in cash or non-cash payments) are required to register with the Customs. The arrested director has been released on bail; investigation still ongoing. The Customs emphasized that all precious metals and gemstone traders, regardless of the size of their business, must comply with Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones (“DPMS”) Regulatory Regime. Violate the registration rule can result in fines of up to HK$100,000 and a maximum of 6 months' imprisonment. The Customs urges all precious metals and gemstone traders that the grace period for registration has ended, and must register before engaging in transactions of HK$120,000 or more. If you are unsure whether you need to register or how to register, it is advisable to contact a professional compliance advisor to avoid any legal breaches. Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones (“DPMS”) Regulatory Regime All entities and individuals involved in the precious metals and gemstones business must comply with the new regulations under the DPMS implemented by the Hong Kong SAR government on 1 April 2023. The system requires businesses engaging in precious metals and gemstones transactions of HK$120,000 or more to register and be monitored by the Customs. Registration Categories Registration Categories Category A Non-cash transactions Category B Cash and non-cash transactions For more information about registering as a precious metals and gemstones trader, please refer to the detailed guidelines on the ComplianceOne website. In accordance with the AMLO, unregistered transactions not only carry legal risks but may also trigger money laundering and terrorist financing concerns. All traders must register with the Customs before engaging in large transactions to ensure compliance. Why Is Regulation Needed for DPMS? Precious metals and gemstones, especially diamonds, gold, and silver, are often used for money laundering, fundraising for terrorism, and other illicit activities. These transactions typically involve large sums of money and untraceable. Without regulation, they can become a breeding ground for financial crimes. The DPMS regulatory regime aims to increase transparency in the precious metals and gemstones market and ensure that the industry is not used for money laundering, terrorist financing, or any other illegal activities. If you have any questions or need assistance with the registration process, please feel free to Contact Us . We provide professional compliance advisory services to help you meet legal requirements smoothly. For more compliance knowledge, join the DPMS online training course on ComplianceOne Onling Training Platform - Thinkific .

天匯合規的聯營公司 億東金融科技有限公司 本年已正式推出東查查反洗錢客戶管理系統 (Screen-X AML/CRM Solutions)。 ComplianceOne Fintech Solutions - Screen-X AML/CRM Solutions 天匯合規金融科技解決方案 – 東查查反洗錢/客戶管理系統 天匯合規的聯營公司 億東金融科技有限公司 本年已正式推出東查查反洗錢/客戶管理系統 (Screen-X AML/CRM Solutions)。 憑藉 天匯合規 在監管合規和資訊科技領域的豐富經驗，我們透徹地了解香港、大灣區、以至全球金融監管的框架，專注為受監管的金融機構和企業提供合規科技解決方案，深入了解監管政策和行業痛點，因此，我們研發了 東查查 ，務求為金融機構提供 全自動化的反洗錢系統 ，以符合監管機構的要求，並協助金融機構 在營運上減低合規風險及提升營運的效率 。 東查查反洗錢/客戶管理系統集 認識你的客戶及客戶盡職審查 、 風險評估 、 持續監察 、 備存紀錄 等功能於一身，為您的合規工作護航，以下會詳細說明。 1. 認識你的客戶及客戶盡職審查 東查查可快速完成客戶身份驗證，包括個人和法人（公司）客戶。系統支持多種身份證件驗證，如身份證、護照、營業執照等，並可自動與國內外公開資料庫進行比對，有效降低KYC過程中的人工核查成本。 2. 客戶風險評估 東查查配備風險評估功能，根據客戶背景、行為、交易等多維度數據，自動計算客戶風險，並針對不同風險級別設定持續監察頻率，幫助您更好地管控合規風險。 3. 持續監察 東查查可設定持續監控客戶的交易活動，實時捕捉可疑交易。同時也能定期審查客戶資料，確保與實際活動保持一致。若客戶的交易模式突然變化或與其聲稱的業務模式不符，會建議進行進一步調查。 4. 備存紀錄 東查查提供客戶管理功能，能協助用戶備存必要的記錄和文件，以便日後監管審查和調查。我們採用嚴格加密及系統安全措施，例如︰數據儲存於阿里雲﹑對數據庫的數據進行加密﹑登錄加密﹑每天備份﹑接口加密，以保護極度敏感的客戶數據免受未經授權的訪問，及確保信息的機密性和完整性。 客戶反饋例 資產管理公司 東查查能準確識別高風險客戶，提供的分析報告也清楚易明，減省了大量人工審查的時間，令同事的工作變得更高效，提升了工作效能。 信託或公司服務提供者（TCSP） 公司一直非常重視反洗錢合規管理，但隨著業務快速增長，傳統的人工盡職調查已難以滿足需求。東查查的價格相宜，可以在網上自行完成購買和使用，操作非常簡便快捷。系統的客戶盡職審查和風險評估功能，大幅提升了我們的工作效率，同時又能確保合規風險的有效管控。 東查查的數據庫供應商介紹 Acuris 自2015年的收購提供了獨特的合規數據集和全球運力 作為擁有專屬的政治公眾人物 (PEPs)、制裁和負面新聞的數據提供者 由全球擁有超過200名懂多種語言的分析師組成的專屬研究團隊 獲得ISO 27001認證 擁有ACAMS認證的研究團隊 立即試用 如有任何查詢，歡迎以下列方式聯絡我們，謝謝！ If you have any questions about this order, please feel free to contact us. Thank you! https://edon.asia/ info@edon.asia (852) 3543 9099 (852) 9690 0882 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29FJ23T0ODc

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: ComplianceOne Newsletter – September 2025 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: REGULATORY UPDATES NASDAQ is pioneering in launching tokenization of stocks SFC consults on extending investor identification regime to exchange-traded derivatives in Hong Kong MARKET NEWS Hong Kong’s securities industry saw continued earnings growth and record transactions in first half of 2025 Only a limited number of licenses will be granted by the HKMA amid 77 applications received for Stablecoin Issuers SFC and Dubai Financial Services Authority bolster ties in supervising cross-border investment management SFC and HKMA unveil roadmap to advance Hong Kong’s vision to be global fixed income and currency hub ENFORCEMENT NEWS SFC Bans Former UBS Advisor Suen Kin-wing for Life Over Money Laundering and Contempt Convictions SFC Bans Former Citigroup Executive Richard Charles Heyes for 5 Years Over Serious Misconducts SFC Reprimands and Fines Instinet Pacific Limited $8 Million for Cross Trade Reporting Failures SFC Upholds Fine on RaffAello Capital for Sponsor Failures in Paprika Listing SFC Reprimands and Fines Roofer Securities $2.1 Million for Client Money Mishandling SFC Secures Disqualification Orders Against Five More Former Directors of Superb Summit Due to misappropriate assets SFC Suspends Former Agg. Asset Management RO Chow Tsz Lam for 12 Months Over Fund Mismanagement SFC Pursues Disqualification Orders Against Former Directors of Century Energy International Holdings Limited Regulatory Updates 1. NASDAQ is pioneering in launching tokenization of stocks In less than two years, the tokenized securities market experienced almost “explosive” growth with on-chain stocks surging from less than 5 million dollars starting from 2024 to 0.42 billion, a more than 80 times increase in two years. The driving wave is originated from the collective entry and accelerated layout of enterprises; both crypto-native companies and traditional financial giants are striving to tap the advantage of being the first-mover in the emerging circuit of tokenized stocks. These moves not only set off a race between crypto and traditional finance, but also a potential “revolution” against the traditional exchange model. Nasdaq, being the world’s second-largest exchange, took the initiative to incorporate tokenized stocks attempting to push itself to be the pioneer in the Wall Street. Some key takeaways we need to know about the moves by NASDAQ: Tokenized stocks are not new stuff, they are new “packaging” for the traditional equity, namely, to connect blockchain’s bookkeeping and settlement capabilities on top of existing financial infrastructure. The appeal of tokenization is that it touched several “core pain points” in the capital market and provide quick solution with: (i) settlement efficiency, (ii) transaction time and accessibility, (iii) programmability of assets. With the completion of the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) upgrade, and the on-chain settlement function early in Q3 next year, there will already be parallel run of cryptocurrency stocks and traditional stocks this year. SIGNIFICANCE: NASDAQ has officially submitted an application for tokenized Stocks trading with the SEC, a “core attempt” by Wall Street in the digitalization process. The core of this proposal is that tokenized stocks should enjoy exactly the same rights and protections as their underlying securities , transaction matching is still carried out in the existing order book, and DTC is responsible for minting equivalent tokens on the chain. As the CEO of NASDAQ has said, “ Blockchain technology offers unprecedented possibilities for shortening settlement cycles, modernizing proxy voting, and automating corporate actions .” To put in simple words, NASDAQ is not trying to do away with the old order, but rather to upgrade the underlying structure of the market with minimal impact and to ensure that the core principles of investor protection and market transparency remain intact . 2. SFC consults on extending investor identification regime to exchange-traded derivatives in Hong Kong The SFC launched a consultation on 22 September 2025 on the proposed investor identification regime for the exchange-traded derivatives market (“ HKIDR-DM ”) which is expected to further consolidate and reinforce the integrity and sustainable development of Hong Kong’s exchange-traded derivatives markets, while a tentative schedule for implementation is in the first quarter of 2028. The proposed HKIDR-DM was established and based on the successful implementation of the similar regime for the securities markets, i.e. the HKIDR-S (the Hong Kong investor identification regime for securities markets). The scope of the HKIDR-DM comprises of order submissions for futures contracts, options contracts and stock options traded on the trading system of the Hong Kong Futures Exchange Limited (“ HKFE ”). Key takeaways are: the regime will apply to Relevant Regulated Intermediaries (“ RRIs ”), i.e., licensed corporations (“ LCs ”) under the SFC and registered institutions (“ RIs ”) under the HKMA that trade (as principal or agent) futures and options contracts; the requirements under the proposed HKIDR-DM are analogous to those currently set out in the HKIDR-S. RRIs will be required to assign a unique “Broker-to-Client Assigned Number” (“ BCAN ”) to Relevant Clients (it basically refers to the immediate client of a RRI who maintains a trading account with the RRI) placing or intending to place orders in the futures market; RRIs must collect and submit up-to-date client identification data (“ CIDs ”) alongside the BCAN in a file (“ BCAN-CID Mapping File ”) to a central data repository maintained by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), the same arrangements as the securities side; SIGNIFICANCE: As Mr. Rico Leung, the SFC’s Executive Director of Supervision of Markets has said, “t o keep up with Hong Kong’s fast-growing derivatives market and align with global best practices, the proposed extension of our investor identification regime represents a major stride in detecting irregularities and protecting investors whilst minimizing operational burden on the industry ”; and he further added that, “ our enhanced cross-market surveillance capabilities will help reinforce market integrity and investors’ confidence – both essential in solidifying Hong Kong’s sustainable development as an international financial center. ” Market News 3. Hong Kong’s securities industry saw continued earnings growth and record transactions in first half of 2025 The latest financial review of the industry issued by the SFC demonstrates a robust growth in the earnings of the securities sector with key promising figures as below: a steady growth momentum with a 14% profit increase to HKD28.9 billion amid record high securities transaction value in the first six months of 2025; a total value of transactions of all securities dealers and securities margin financiers reached a record HKD99.2 trillion in the first half of 2025, a recorded increase of 22% from Q2 of 2024 and 57% (year-over-year); the net profits of all the SEHK participants were up 34% during the previous 6 months to HKD15.6 billion. The main driving forces are attributed to the steady growth of trading commission, reduction in overheads and interest expenses; within the revenue side, the net securities income was up 23% to HKD13.6 billion and income from advising on corporate finance was up 33% to HKD2 billion! One point deserves attention is that the net profits of Category C brokers, which cater for general public and small retail investors, doubled to HKD2.5 billion, implying a holistic recovery of the brokerage business rather than being concentrated on the top category brokers. SIGNIFICANCE: As Dr Eric Yip, the SFC’s Executive Director of Intermediaries, said, “ once again, the solid performance of our licensed corporations showcases the strength and agility of our financial industry in a fast-changing business landscape , underscoring their key role in driving Hong Kong’s continued success as a top international financial centre. ” 4. HKMA to grant limited stablecoin licenses amid 77 stablecoin application Main themes of the press are that: the 77 applicants originated from a range of sectors comprising of banking, technology firms, asset manager, e-commerce platforms, payment companies and Web3 startups; only a limited number of stablecoin licenses will be issued in the initial stage; only applicants meeting strict compliance requirements will be granted approvals. Key takeaways readers should know : the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ("HKMA") would not publish the list of entities showing interests or submitting applications; and reiterated that communications with the applicants did not indicate any hints of regulatory approval; the meetings were only meant to help applicants evaluate the necessity and maturity of their issuance plans before making a formal submission; with the stablecoin licensing regime came into effect on 1 August 2025, it serves as a regulatory reference point to develop the virtual asset framework. As only a limited number of licenses will be granted, some applicants either postpone applications, partner with existing licensees or adopt alternative structures to meet the strict compliance thresholds. These adaptive adjustments amid the screening process help shape the evolving regulatory regime of the nascent stablecoin ecosystem. 5. SFC and Dubai Financial Services Authority bolster ties in supervising cross-border investment management The SFC and the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“ DFSA ”), the independent regulator of the Dubai International Financial Centre (“ DIFC ”), today signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to deepen cooperation on the regulatory oversight and supervision of collective investment scheme managers in each other’s markets to ensure compliance, governance, and cross-border regulatory alignment. Key takeaways of the MOU: underscoring the significance of cross-border regulatory collaboration and Hong Kong’s growing ties with the Belt and Road jurisdictions; establishing a collaborative framework for consultation, cooperation and the exchange of information in order to enhance the regulators’ supervision and oversight of regulated entities which engage in cross-border investment management or advisory activities; signifying the efforts of joint collaboration of the high-level meetings between the SFC and the DFSA over the years. SIGNIFICANCE: As comments from SFC and DFSA officials, the MOU is a consequence of strengthened SFC-DFSA partnership which underscores the shared commitment to mutual benefits of HK and DIFC as internation financial hubs, and efforts towards regulatory excellence, supervision and cross-border innovation between the two jurisdictions. 6. SFC and HKMA unveil roadmap to advance Hong Kong’s vision to be global fixed income and currency hub The SFC and the HKMA jointly announced Hong Kong’s Roadmap for the Development of Fixed Income and Currency (“ FIC ”) Markets (the “ Roadmap ”) on 25 September 2025 to position the city strategically as a global FIC hub by fostering demand, liquidity and innovation. An overview of the Roadmap is outlined as below with FOUR pillars and TEN initiatives: Reinforcing Foundations Pillar 1: Boosting issuance in primary market Initiative 1: Lead by example through government bond issuance Initiative 2: : Promote Hong Kong’s strengths to issuers and investors in target markets Initiative 3: Expand investor base including family offices, funds and corporate treasury centres Pillar 2: Enhancing liquidity in secondary market Initiative 4: Finalize implementation of over-the-counter FIC derivatives regime Initiative 5: Facilitate development of a repo central counterparty Breaking New Ground Pillar 3: Expand offshore RMB business Initiative 6: Broaden offshore RMB usage Initiative 7: Enhance Connect schemes to increase offshore RMB liquidity and RMB-related product offerings Pillar 4: Next-generation infrastructure Initiative 8: Future-proof FIC financial market infrastructure Initiative 9: Support development of next-generation electronic trading platforms Initiative 10: Facilitate market innovation and implementation of use cases for tokenized FIC products SIGNIFICANCE: The Roadmap will guide the policy making and implementation of the SFC and the HKMA in coming years to support the sustainable and diversified growth of Hong Kong’s capital markets. Comments from key officials highlight the significance of the Roadmap: Dr. Kelvin Wong, Chairman of the SFC: “ The Roadmap is poised to guide our marketevolution that will benefit issuers, investors and intermediaries alike for years to come ”. Mr. Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the HKMA: “ The Roadmap comprehensively set out our work focuses in the near future . We look forward to implementing the initiatives in collaboration with industry stakeholders. ” Ms. Julia Leung, Chief Executive Officer of the SFC: “ The Roadmap reflects our close collaboration and shared commitment with the HKMA, industry partners and other stakeholders to enhance Hong Kong’ s vital role in bridging Mainland and international capital markets .” Enforcement News 7. SFC Bans Former UBS Advisor Suen Kin-wing for Life Over Money Laundering and Contempt Convictions On 2 September 2025, the SFC has imposed a lifetime ban on Mr. SUEN Kin-wing (“ SUEN ”), a former Associate Director at UBS AG (“ UBS ”), preventing him from re-entering the industry. This action follows SUEN's criminal convictions for money laundering and contempt of court, highlighting serious breaches of trust and regulatory standards. Background of the Case SUEN, who served as a Client Advisor at UBS from January 2014 to June 2018, was responsible for Type 1 and Type 4 regulated activities. The issues stemmed from his dealings with two Mainland Chinese clients who held a joint account at UBS. Facing challenges in transferring RMB funds from Mainland China to Hong Kong, the clients entered into an arrangement with SUEN to facilitate cross-border transfers. Under this setup, the clients deposited over RMB132 million into Mainland bank accounts designated by SUEN between November 2016 and February 2018. SUEN provided what appeared to be legitimate transaction confirmations and bank statements showing the funds had reached the joint account. However, the clients later discovered that a substantial portion of the money was missing. Investigations revealed that over HK$134 million had been diverted into two Hong Kong bank accounts controlled by SUEN. The Court determined these funds were proceeds of crime, as SUEN had defrauded or stolen them from his clients. He used the misappropriated money to fund a luxurious lifestyle, including purchases of high-end vehicles and properties in the UK and Mainland China. Legal Outcomes Charge(s) Remarks Case No. Money Laundering Conviction On June 21, 2024, the Court of First Instance sentenced SUEN to 10 years' imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to two counts of dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offense. HCCC 77/2021 Contempt of Court In July 2018, the clients secured a worldwide freezing injunction against SUEN to recover the stolen funds, prohibiting him from disposing of assets up to HK$130 million. Despite this, SUEN transferred his interests in several UK properties to a British Virgin Islands (BVI) company he owned, violating the order. On 20 December 2023, he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment for contempt. HCMP 633/2019 SIGNIFICANCE: Given the severity of SUEN's actions, which demonstrated a profound lack of honesty and professionalism, the SFC has deemed him unfit and improper to hold any regulated position in the future. SUEN is currently neither registered with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (“ HKMA ”) nor licensed by the SFC. This case serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of financial misconduct and the SFC's zero-tolerance policy toward activities that undermine market confidence. Industry professionals are encouraged to review internal controls and compliance measures to prevent similar incidents. 8. SFC Bans Former Citigroup Executive Richard Charles Heyes for 5 Years Over Serious Misconducts In a significant move underscoring the importance of senior management accountability, the SFC has imposed a five-year industry ban on Richard Charles Heyes (“ Heyes ”), a former key figure at Citigroup Global Markets Asia Limited (“ CGMAL ”). Effective from 15 September 2025 to 14 September 2030, the ban prevents Heyes from re-entering the financial industry in any licensed capacity. Heyes, who served as a RO, Manager-In-Charge (“ MIC ”) of Key Business Line, board member, and Head of Pan-Asia Equities at CGMAL, has been held accountable for serious regulatory breaches and internal control lapses at the firm. These issues stem from a decade-long period (i.e. 2008–2018) where CGMAL's Cash Equities business disseminated mislabelled Indications of Interest (“ IOIs ”) and made misrepresentations to institutional clients during facilitation trades. Key Details of the SFC's Findings: The SFC's investigation highlighted Heyes' failure to fulfill his supervisory and managerial duties, which directly contributed to CGMAL's violations. Specifically: 1. Mislabelled IOIs Heyes overlooked practices at the Equities Sales Trading Desk where IOIs were falsely labelled to elicit client inquiries. Despite a 2014 SFC review flagging concerns with CGMAL's IOI processes, Heyes did not implement adequate controls. Additionally, between 2017 and 2018, he received reports of client complaints about IOI accuracy but took no action to investigate or halt the misconduct. 2. Misrepresentations in Facilitation Trades In 2014, Heyes attended an SFC roundtable that SFC emphasized the need for explicit client consent and pre-trade disclosures for facilitation trades. However, he failed to ensure CGMAL had proper guidelines or monitoring in place. Emails forwarded to him revealed traders disguising facilitation trades as agency trades to boost market share, but these went unaddressed. These lapses allowed a culture prioritizing revenue over client interests and ethical standards to persist within CGMAL. The SFC emphasized that Heyes' neglect enabled the firm's internal control failures to continue unchecked for over ten years. Factors Influencing the Sanction In determining the five-year ban, the SFC considered: The severity of Heyes' neglect, which enabled prolonged regulatory breaches. His extensive industry experience, which should have ensured higher standards as an RO, MIC, board member, and senior manager. The need to send a strong deterrent message to the industry. Mitigating factors, including Heyes' cooperation with the SFC, withdrawal of his appeal to the Securities and Futures Appeals Tribunal, and his otherwise clean disciplinary record. This action follows prior SFC sanctions against CGMAL itself for the same underlying issues. For more details of the case, please refer to the Statement of Disciplinary Action . SIGNIFICANCE: Christopher Wilson, SFC's Executive Director of Enforcement, stated: "Senior management of a licensed corporation bears primary responsibility for ensuring the firm’s maintenance of appropriate standards of conduct and adherence to proper procedures. By exerting significant pressure on the trading desks to grow CGMAL’s market share while failing to be vigilant for telltale signs that his subordinates were achieving this by dishonest means, Heyes neglected and failed to properly discharge his managerial responsibility." Wilson added that the SFC will actively use the MIC regime to hold senior executives accountable, aiming to foster cultural and behavioral changes among intermediaries. This case serves as a stark reminder for financial institutions in Hong Kong and beyond: Senior leaders must prioritize robust compliance frameworks, vigilant oversight, and ethical practices. With regulators increasingly focusing on individual accountability, firms should review their internal controls, training programs, and escalation procedures to prevent similar failures. 9. SFC Reprimands and Fines Instinet Pacific Limited $8 Million for Cross Trade Reporting Failures The SFC has issued a reprimand and imposed an $8 million fine on Instinet Pacific Limited (Instinet) for non-compliance with reporting requirements for direct business transactions, commonly known as cross trades, to The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“ SEHK ”). Key Details of the Case The SFC's investigation uncovered that from December 2012 to March 2018, Instinet failed to report 8,817 pairs of cross trades totalling approximately $25.9 billion in value between its clients and an affiliated company. This breach violated the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission. During this period, Instinet lacked any internal policies, procedures, or monitoring mechanisms for reporting cross trades to the SEHK, and it conducted no reviews of its trade reporting processes. Scope of the Breach: The unreported trades spanned over five years and involved significant transaction volumes, highlighting systemic deficiencies in Instinet's compliance framework. Code and Rule Violations: The failures contravened the SFC's Code of Conduct and Rules of the Exchange, which mandates proper cross trades reporting. In deciding the disciplinary sanction, the SFC has taken into account all relevant circumstances, including the duration of Instinet’s failure, the number of unreported cross trades and the sum involved, and Instinet’s initiative to cease the relevant trade flows and cooperation with the SFC in resolving the SFC’s concerns. For more details of the case, please refer to the Statement of Disciplinary Action . SIGNIFICANCE: This enforcement action reinforces the SFC's commitment to upholding market transparency through strict adherence to reporting obligations. Financial institutions must prioritize robust internal controls, regular reviews, and comprehensive policies to monitor trade reporting. Failures in these areas can lead to significant penalties and reputational damage. Firms are encouraged to audit their compliance systems, particularly for cross trades and affiliated transactions, to align with SEHK and SFC standards. 10. SFC Upholds Fine on RaffAello Capital for Sponsor Failures in Paprika Listing In a recent decision, the Securities and Futures Appeals Tribunal (“ SFAT ”) has affirmed the SFC reprimand and $4 million fine against RaffAello Capital Limited (“ RaffAello ”) for shortcomings in its role as sponsor for Paprika Holdings Limited's Paprika listing application. This case underscores the critical importance of rigorous due diligence in Hong Kong's capital markets, highlighting lapses that could undermine investor confidence. Background on the Case RaffAello, a licensed corporate finance advisor, sponsored Paprika's application for listing on the Growth Enterprise Market (“ GEM ”) of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited ("SEHK"), submitted in June 2017 but withdrawn in April 2018. Paprika, a handbag and accessories retailer, relied heavily on retail sales, accounting for about 90% of its revenue in the two financial years ending March 2017, with over 80% from physical stores. The SFC's investigation revealed that RaffAello failed to conduct reasonable due diligence and lacked professional scepticism when reviewing Paprika's provided information. Key issues centered on suspicious retail transactions and questionable relationships with key business partners. Key Findings Failings in Retail Sales Due Diligence During a sample walkthrough of retail store transactions from 19 February to 13 March 2016, RaffAello uncovered several red flags: Approximately 230 consecutive cash transactions across stores, involving 1,431 handbags, made up 90% of cash sales and 42% of total sales on those dates. Many occurred within 1-10 minutes. Around 240 bulk credit card purchases of 1,860 handbags by individuals, including owners of Paprika's wholesaler and suppliers, accounting for 83% of credit card sales and 45% of total sales. Invoices marked "POS Test" (point-of-sale system testing) were included in sales records. Despite inquiries, RaffAello largely accepted explanations from Paprika and involved parties without deeper scrutiny. The SFC noted overlooked indicators suggesting potential fabrication to inflate sales figures. Inadequate Scrutiny of Key Partners RaffAello also fell short in verifying the independence of Paprika's largest wholesaler, Novi eBusiness Limited (“ Novi ”) (responsible for over 90% of a 96% wholesale revenue surge from 2016 to 2017), and its fifth-largest supplier, API Trading Company Limited (“ API ”) (part of suppliers accounting for 53.4% of 2017 purchase costs). Red flags included: Bovi and API both were former subsidiaries of a company linked to a 15% Paprika shareholder. Acquisitions facilitated by Paprika's founder, Chairman, and CEO, Mr. Samuel Leung ("Leung"). Novi's owner partnered with Mainland Chinese firms tied to Leung's authorized payment recipients. Owners of both entities made repeated bulk purchases from Paprika stores. Additionally, RaffAello did not sufficiently probe API's business substance, especially after discovering it acted as an intermediary for a pre-existing supplier (i.e. Lung Yiu), with supplies jumping from $41,000 in 2016 to $3.18 million in 2017. SIGNIFICANCE: The SFC initially proposed a $13 million fine but reduced it to $4 million due to RaffAello's financial constraints, a decision the SFAT upheld to avoid liquidation and harm to clients. Chaired by Mr. Michael Hartmann, GBS, the Tribunal emphasized sponsors' duties under the Code of Conduct: when red flags arise, additional due diligence is mandatory, including detailed documentation and consultations (e.g., with reporting accountants) rather than assumptions. The Tribunal noted: "If issues of concern are identified, it is not sufficient for the sponsor simply to investigate the matter, make a bald note of that fact... a coherent note should be made of what has been discovered and what has been resolved." Over-reliance on management's representations was deemed unreasonable. Related actions include a two-year industry ban for Mr. Tsang Kwong Fai , RaffAello's responsible officer overseeing the application. This ruling serves as a stark reminder for sponsors to apply professional scepticism and thorough investigations. It reinforces SFC's commitment to maintaining listing integrity, potentially influencing future due diligence practices in Hong Kong's vibrant IPO market. 11. SFC Reprimands and Fines Roofer Securities $2.1 Million for Client Money Mishandling The SFC has issued a reprimand and imposed a $2.1 million fine on Roofer Securities Limited ("Roofer") for violations related to the improper handling of client funds. This action highlights the SFC's ongoing commitment to enforcing strict segregation rules to protect investor assets in Hong Kong's financial markets. Case Overview The investigation, initiated following a referral from the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (“ HKEX ”), uncovered 12 incidents between 8 February 2021, and 7 July 2022, where Roofer failed to maintain adequate funds in its segregated client account. In one notable instance, the shortfall reached $15.5 million. These breaches stemmed from several operational lapses: Using client account funds to cover margin calls (actual or anticipated) from HKEX which is not paid in accordance with a written direction or standing authority form the client and/or used to meet the client’s settlement or margin requirement. Failure in client money segregation due to inadequate management of daily online bank transfer limits. Human errors by staff. The SFC determined that these failures violated the Securities and Futures (Client Money) Rules and the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC. Mitigating Factors and Sanctions In determining the penalty, the SFC considered various factors, including: No clients suffered financial losses due to the incidents. Roofer promptly rectified the under-segregation in each case and implemented remedial measures, such as strengthening internal controls and processes. The firm's full cooperation with the SFC during the investigation. Roofer's clean prior disciplinary record. For more details of the case, please refer to the Statement of Disciplinary Action . SIGNIFICANCE: This case serves as a reminder to licensed corporations of the critical need for robust internal systems to ensure client money segregation. Failures in this area can erode market trust and expose firms to significant regulatory penalties. The SFC's balanced approach factoring in remediation and cooperation, demonstrates its focus on proportionate enforcement while upholding high standards. 12. SFC Secures Disqualification Orders Against Five More Former Directors of Superb Summit Due to misappropriate assets The SFC has successfully obtained disqualification orders from the Court of First Instance against an additional five former directors of Superb Summit International Group Limited (“ Superb Summit ”), bringing the total number of disqualified directors to 10. This latest action emphasizes the SFC's rigorous enforcement of director duties in cases involving misleading acquisitions and non-existent assets. This follows earlier disqualifications in June 2025 against five other former directors: Mr. Lee Chi Kong (10 years), Mr. Wong Yun Kuen (7 years), and Messrs. Lam Ping Kei, Wong Choi Fung, and Yeung Kwong Lun (5 years each). The SFC's investigations and proceedings against additional former directors and officers of Superb Summit continue. Director(s) involved: Director(s) Disqualifications Mr. Chan Chi Yuen (“ CHAN ”) 4 Years Mr. Law Wai Fai (“ LAW ”); and Mr. Cheng Man (“ CHENG ”) 3.5 Years each Mr. Qiu Jizhi (“ QIU ”) 3 Years Mr. Li Jun (“ LI ”) 2.5 Years Details of the Breaches Superb Summit, listed on the Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited from September 2001 until its delisting in June 2020, engaged in two problematic acquisitions: 2007 Acquisition : LAW, LI, QIU, AND CHAN failed to adequately review key documents or critically assess the methodologies and assumptions used by professionals during due diligence on the target company's alleged forestry assets. 2009 Acquisition : LAW, CHENG, AND CHAN neglected to properly verify the ownership of the claimed forestry assets. They also approved a company announcement containing false or misleading information about these non-existent assets. The SFC initiated proceedings under section 214 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance in December 2020. The disqualifications were resolved via the Carecraft procedure, where the court approved orders based on agreed facts and proposed sanctions. Overview of the Disqualifications The affected individuals include three former executive directors, LAW, LI and CHENG and two former independent non-executive directors, QIU and CHAN. The orders, effective immediately, prohibit them from serving as directors or participating in the management of any corporation in Hong Kong or elsewhere for periods ranging from two and a half to four years. Additionally, the former directors have been ordered to cover the SFC's costs in the proceedings. These sanctions follow their admissions of breaching duties and negligence related to Superb Summit's acquisitions in 2007 and 2009, which involved purported forestry assets that proved to be fictitious. **For the detail of judgment and the prior disqualifications, please refer to: - the Judiciary’s website (Case No. HCMP 2305/2020 ); or - the SFC’s press release dated 11 July 2025 ,.** SIGNIFICANCE: These orders reinforce the SFC's stance on accountability for directors, particularly in due diligence and disclosure processes. They highlight the severe consequences of negligence in approving transactions with misleading elements, serving as a cautionary tale for boards in Hong Kong's listed companies to uphold rigorous standards to protect investors and maintain market integrity. 13. SFC Suspends Former Agg. Asset Management RO Chow Tsz Lam for 12 Months Over Fund Mismanagement The SFC has suspended Mr. CHOW Tsz Lam (“ CHOW ”), a former RO and manager-in-charge at the now-dissolved Agg. Asset Management Limited (“ Agg ”), for 12 months effective from 2 September 2025, to 1 September 2026. This disciplinary measure addresses failures in fund management practices that exposed investors to undue risks and conflicts of interest. Investigation Findings The SFC's probe revealed that Agg, acting as investment manager for a Cayman-incorporated fund, allocated up to 100% of the fund's assets into debentures issued by entities controlled by Mr. NG Ka Shun (“ NG ”), Agg's sole shareholder, director, and fellow RO. This approach neglected to mitigate conflicts of interest and adequately manage associated risks (concentration risks and credit risks). Furthermore, Agg directed the fund into two debentures seemingly designed to artificially inflate the fund's net asset value. CHOW, as an RO and senior management member, was found to have fallen short in ensuring Agg operated in the best interests of the fund and its investors, while adhering to regulatory standards. Although primary responsibility lay with NG (who made the investment decisions), CHOW's oversight lapses contributed to these breaches. For more details of the case, please refer to the Statement of Disciplinary Action . SIGNIFICANCE: This case underscores the SFC's emphasis on robust conflict management and risk oversight in asset management, particularly where personal interests intersect with firm operations. It serves as a reminder for ROs and senior executives to prioritize investor protection and regulatory compliance, with self-reporting potentially mitigating penalties. The SFC previously issued a lifetime ban and $1.7 million fine to NG for window-dressing Agg's financial resources and mismanaging two funds (see SFC press release dated 23 December 2024 ). Agg itself faced a restriction notice in April 2020 prohibiting regulated activities, leading to its dissolution in July 2024 and deemed license revocation. 14. SFC Pursues Disqualification Orders Against Former Directors of Century Energy International Holdings Limited The SFC has initiated legal proceedings to seek court orders disqualifying four former directors of Century Energy International Holdings Limited ("CEIHL", formerly known as China Oil Gangran Energy Group Holdings Limited). The action targets individuals accused of misconduct that led to substantial financial losses for CEIHL. Background on CEIHL CEIHL, listed on the Growth Enterprise Market of the SEHK since 18 May 2011, was primarily involved in trading refined oil and methyl tert-butyl ether, as well as manufacturing and selling power and data cords. CEIHL's troubles stem from the loss of control over four major operating subsidiaries in Mainland China, which accounted for over 80% of its total revenue for the year ended 31 March 2018, and more than 40% of its total assets as of that date. These subsidiaries were deconsolidated from CEIHL's accounts effective 1 January 2019, resulting in a staggering loss of $184 million for the fiscal year ended 31 March 2019. Allegations of Misconduct The SFC alleges that these former directors failed to adequately supervise the Mainland subsidiaries and did not act in the best interests of the company. This prolonged lack of oversight contributed to the deconsolidation of the subsidiaries and the ensuing financial losses. Furthermore, Mr. Ho, Ms. Yang, and Mr. Lau are accused of being responsible for the publication of a 2014 circular that contained inaccurate or misleading information about one of the operating subsidiaries. Under section 214 of the SFO , the Court of First Instance may impose disqualification orders preventing individuals from serving as directors or being involved in the management of any corporation for up to 15 years if they are found responsible for conduct involving defalcation, fraud, misfeasance, or other misconduct toward the company or its members. The SFC's proceedings name the following accused directors: Mr. Gregory Ho Chun Kit (“HO”) Former executive director. Mr. Zheng Jian Peng (“ZHENG”) Former executive director, chief financial officer, and company secretary. Ms. Eugenia Yang (“YANG”) Former independent non-executive director. Mr. Vincent Lau Sung Tat (“LAU”) Former independent non-executive director. The SFC alleges that these former directors failed to adequately supervise the Mainland subsidiaries and did not act in the best interests of CEIHL. This prolonged lack of oversight contributed to the deconsolidation of the subsidiaries and the ensuing financial losses. Furthermore, HO, YANG, and LAU are accused of being responsible for the publication of a 2014 circular that contained inaccurate or misleading information about one of the operating subsidiaries. Under section 214 of the SFO , the Court of First Instance may impose disqualification orders preventing individuals from serving as directors or being involved in the management of any corporation for up to 15 years if they are found responsible for conduct involving defalcation, fraud, misfeasance, or other misconduct toward the company or its members. SIGNIFICANCE: This case highlights the SFC's commitment to enforcing corporate governance standards and holding directors accountable for oversight failures in Hong Kong-listed companies. Investors in Hong Kong-listed companies should note the potential risks associated with operations in cross-border subsidiaries and the importance of robust internal controls. [End of ComplianceOne Newsletter – September2025] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: ComplianceOne Newsletter - September 2023 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. The JPEX Fraudulence 2. SFC amended the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buybacks with effective from 29 September 2023 3. HKEX FINI to launch on 22 November 2023 with pricing of IPO shortened to T+2 4. SFC commenced a cybersecurity review of selected licensed corporations focusing on cybersecurity management 5. SFC fined Chee Tak Securities Limited $2 million and sanctioned its responsible officer for internal control deficiencies and a host of regulatory breaches 6. SFC revoked Axial Capital Management Limited’s licence for repeated failures to comply with the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rules 7. LO Wai Ming, a former RO of Taiping Securities (HK) Co Limited, was banned by SFC for unauthorized trading of client accounts 8. SFC obtained interim injunction against former director of SMI Culture & Travel Group Holdings Limited (formerly 2366.HK ) MARKET NEWS 1. The JPEX fraudulence On 13 September 2023, the SFC released an astonishing warning statement of its awareness of a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) known as “JPEX” which has been actively promoting its products and services to the Hong Kong public through social media influencers and key opinion leaders (KOLs) as well as over-the-counter virtual asset money changers. The SFC made it clear in the statement that no entity in the JPEX group was licensed by the SFC or had applied to the SFC for a licence to operate a VATP in Hong Kong; and a number of suspicious features about the practices of JPEX had been observed: a) The declaration made by JPEX that it was “a licensed and recognised platform to facilitate the trading of digital asset and virtual currency” was not true. b) JPEX offered very high returns for some of its products. c) The SFC had received complaints from retail investors who were unable to withdraw virtual assets from their accounts maintained with JPEX. d) Some of the products offered by JPEX appeared to be involving virtual asset “deposits”, “savings” or “earnings” which are not allowed under the SFC’s regulatory regime for VATPs. e) JPEX publicised on its website and local advertorials that it had entered into a business cooperation with and received investment from a Hong Kong listed company which in fact had been terminated already. f) KOLs and OTC Shops had made false or misleading statements on social media to suggest that JPEX had applied for a VATP licence in Hong Kong. SIGNIFICANCE: The warning statement aroused the scepticism of many investors, and rendered a large tide of withdrawal requests; strange enough was the subsequent arrangement and feedback of JPEX to restrict the withdrawal amount to a maximum of USDT1000 per request with withdrawal fee of up to USDT999. Such unscrupulous responses to investors triggered a large number of reported cases of fraudulence to the HK Police and it unveiled the undertow that it was merely the “the tip of the iceberg”. More than 1,000 cases were reported at the first around, and with the amount of stake up to HKD1.5 billion! The SFC was rather proactive to respond this time when confronted with criticism from the public that NOT sufficient information was published to enhance the public awareness of the incidence of JPEX despite its high-profile, large-scale social media advertisement which swept over the entire city and conveyed a misleading image that it was a legitimate virtual assets trading platform. It should be noted that the legislations for governing the virtual asset regime and the AML Guidelines were only effected in June 2023 with the “Guideline on Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Financing of Terrorism (For Licensed Corporations and SFC-licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers)” and “Guidelines for Virtual Asset Trading Platform Operators”, and only after which that the SFC is vested with the authority to regulate the virtual asset regime and to enforce the guidelines for protection of the general public. In light of recent public concerns about unregulated virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs), the SFC put forward a series of measures to reinforce information dissemination and investor education. Some remedial measure had been launched to provide the public with more information from its announcement on 25 September 2023 as a response to the vehement vogue for more transparent status of the licensing status of some ongoing VATPs which included: a) a “List of licensed VATPs”; b) a “List of closing-down VATPs” setting out the names of VATPs required by law to close down within a specified period; c) a “List of deemed licensed VATPs” consisting of the names of VATPs which are deemed to be licensed as of 1 June 2024; d) in light of public demand, a list of VATP applicants. The SFC also took an active role to collaborate with the Police and set up a dedicated channel to share information on suspicious activities of and breaches by VATPs as well as investigate the JPEX incident to bring the wrong-doers to justice. And there were also a couple of press conferences from the SFC and the Police to demonstrate to the public that the JPEX fraudulence ranked top priority on the list with their dedicated mission of the ultimate goal to protect the investors, especially in Hong Kong as an international financial centre, and the recent high-profile roadshow of the HIKSAR government to establish Hong Kong as a pioneer in licensing the virtual asset landscape over the rest of the world. A few days later on 29 September 2023, the SFC made another announcement with a series of “ Lists of virtual asset trading platforms ” to accommodate the vehement vogue for more information of VATP from the public. Besides, a dedicated list of suspicious VATPs was also published to help investors more easily identify suspicious VATPs doing business in Hong Kong and enhance awareness. At this stage, there are more than 2,000 reported cases from investors, and the amount of stake surged up to nearly HKD1.5 billion. It is just the beginning of the story with more than 20 suspects arrested for further investigation by the Police. Ironically, it may be a good opportunity for the HKSAR Government to demonstrate to the world its competence and tactics in settling and sorting out this JPEX scam which is analogous to the incidence of the FTX in the US. 2. SFC amended the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buybacks with effect from 29 September 2023 On 21 September 2023, the SFC released the consultation conclusions on its proposed amendments to the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs (the “Codes”) which would then be gazetted on 29 September 2023 and took effect immediately. All the proposals were adopted with minor modifications only. SIGNIFICANCE: It should be noted that the amendments mainly codify existing practices of the Takeovers Executive and clarify the Codes where necessary, including revising the definitions of important terms, streaming the process to enhance efficiency etc. Further be noted that consequential amendments will be made to a number of Practice Notes to the Codes and will be available on the SFC website when the revised Codes take effect. Market practitioners are encouraged to read and get themselves acquainted with the amendments. 3. HKEX FINI to launch on 22 November 2023 with pricing of IPO shortened to T+2 On 27 September 2023, the HKEX was pleased to confirm the launch date for FINI, Hong Kong’s new digitalised IPO settlement platform, on 22 November 2023. FINI is a major new initiative that will significantly shorten the time between the pricing of an IPO and the trading of shares from five business days (T+5) to two business days (T+2). FINI is a cloud-based platform , which will enable different stakeholders such as IPO sponsors, underwriters, legal advisers, banks, clearing participants, share registrars and regulators to collaborate and perform their respective roles in an IPO, digitally. A new public offer pre-funding model is also being introduced in FINI , helping to reduce the scale of locked-up funds in over-subscribed IPOs. SIGNIFICANCE: The launch of FINI is a milestone development in the evolution of the city’s capital markets; it will modernise and digitalise Hong Kong’s IPO settlement process, driving efficiency and supporting the long-term development of Hong Kong as a capital raising centre. 4. SFC commenced a cybersecurity review of selected licensed corporations focusing on cybersecurity management A circular was released on 15 September 2023 saying that the SFC would commence a cybersecurity review of selected licensed corporations (LCs) with a focus on assessing their cybersecurity management and compliance as well as the resilience of their information systems against cybersecurity threats. Cybersecurity has long been a major focus of the SFC’s supervision of LCs which offer internet trading to their clients, and are required to comply with the requirements set out in the Guidelines for Reducing and Mitigating Hacking Risks Associated with Internet Trading (Cybersecurity Guidelines), the cybersecurity frequently asked questions (FAQs) and the expected standards set out in the “Report on the 2019-20 thematic cybersecurity review of internet brokers”. The cybersecurity incidents reported to the SFC by some LCs in recent years and the SFC’s inspection findings show a number of security loopholes and deficiencies, including the use of end-of-life software as well as inadequate controls over remote access and phishing attacks which hackers may easily exploit to infiltrate LCs’ information systems. SIGNIFICANCE: It is a common scenario and arrangement for many LCs to employ third-party technology vendors to supply and support business application systems, posing additional risks in hosting their systems and data in the cloud environment where the responsible officer (“RO”) or the senior management team may not be so conversant in cybersecurity risks. In the light of this and to better assess the industry’s preparedness for and resilience to cyber risks, the SFC would commence a cybersecurity review in September 2023. A snapshot of the key takeaways are as follows: a) the SFC would conduct a survey of selected LCs of different sizes and business types, including securities and futures brokers, leveraged foreign exchange traders, global financial institutions and firms which provide online product distribution platforms; b) the SFC would meet with selected LCs to better understand their cybersecurity governance and controls; and c) the SFC would perform on-site inspections of some of the selected LCs for a deep dive review of their information technology and related management controls and an assessment of their compliance with the Cybersecurity Guidelines and other expected standards. Cybersecurity risk management has become a serious issue deserving imminent attention from senior management of many LCs especially with the upcoming reported cases of phishing attacks which pose unprecedented and irrevocable risk of data leakage. ENFORCEMENT NEWS 5. SFC fined Chee Tak Securities Limited $2 million and sanctioned its responsible officer for internal control deficiencies and a host of regulatory breaches On 18 September 2023, the SFC had fined Chee Tak Securities Limited (CTSL) $2 million for internal control deficiencies and a host of regulatory breaches; and also suspended the license of its responsible officer Kevin Chiu Koon Yu (CHIU) for 10 months. The disciplinary actions followed the SFC’s investigation which found that, between 1 July 2018 and 5 March 2020, CTSL failed to: (i) have in place an order recording policy and observe the order recording requirements; (ii) implement effective internal controls to monitor cross trades between staff members and clients and to ensure fair treatment of clients; (iii) establish and maintain an adequate and effective monitoring system to detect and assess suspicious transactions in client accounts; (iv) set up systems and controls to identify and assess third-party deposits into client accounts; (v) require or obtain written third-party authorisation for the operation of client accounts; and (vi) institute internal controls to monitor employee dealings. SIGNIFICANCE: The failures of CTSL constituted breaches of the Code of Conduct, the Internal Control Guidelines and the Circular to licensed corporations and associated entities – Third-party deposits and payments; and the SFC had considered that CTSL’s failures were attributable to the failures of CHIU in discharging his duties as its responsible officer and a member of its senior management which called into question his fitness and properness. CHIU had been accredited to CTSL since Nov 2004 for nineteen years, and was still not competent to discharge his duties as a RO properly, it unveils the hidden picture that some ROs may not have properly updated themselves with the prevailing guidelines, or are not aware of them during their tenures in the capacity for years. 6. SFC revoked Axial Capital Management Limited’s licence for repeated failures to comply with the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rules On 11 September 2023, the SFC had revoked the licence of Axial Capital Management Limited (Axial) for repeated failures to comply with the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rules (FRR), the SFO and the Code of Conduct. Meanwhile, the responsible officer, Mr Eugene CHUNG, whose license would also be suspended for five years to September 2028. The investigation of the SFC found that Axial failed to maintain its required liquid capital of $100,000 for a consecutive period of 19 months starting from 28 March 2019, and Axial only notified the SFC 18 months later! In addition, Axial also failed to submit the semi-annual FRR returns and the audited financial statements from 2019 to 2022, despite repeated reminders from the SFC to do so. SIGNIFICANCE: The SFC's view that Axial’s failures were attributable to the failure of CHUNG in discharging his duty as the firm’s senior management and RO is something " a fact beyond controversy "; the crucial point in this case here is its prolonged period of time and repeated patterns of omissions which a competent licensed person is NOT supposed to overlook! 7. LO Wai Ming, a former RO of Taiping Securities (HK) Co Limited, was banned by SFC for unauthorized trading of client accounts. On 18 September 2023, the SFC had prohibited Mr LO Wai Ming (LO), a former responsible officer of Taiping Securities (HK) Co Limited (TSCL), from re-entering the industry for seven months from 16 September 2023 to 15 April 2024. The disciplinary action followed an SFC investigation which found that between 2 January 2018 and 28 September 2018, LO had, unbeknownst to TSCL, logged into two clients’ internet trading accounts and placed orders for them. As a result, trades in the clients’ accounts were effectively disguised as if they have been placed by the clients themselves . SIGNIFICANCE: It was obvious that LO intended to circumvent TSCL’s internal policies by concealing the fact that he was trading on behalf of the two clients, and avoided the conflict of interest to be monitored under the regular routines. Such dishonest deeds and intention to play around with the loopholes should definitely be reprimanded in the eyes of the SFC. 8. SFC obtained interim injunction against former director of SMI Culture & Travel Group Holdings Limited (formerly 2366.HK) On 25 September 2023, the SFC had obtained an interim injunction order at the Court of First Instance (CFI) against Ms Leung Anita Fung Yee Maria (LEUNG), former chief executive officer and executive director of SMI Culture & Travel Group Holdings Limited (SMI Culture & Travel Group), to preserve assets for satisfying a compensation order that the court might impose at the conclusion of legal proceedings brought by the SFC. The application for an interim injunction order to prohibit LEUNG from disposing assets in Hong Kong and elsewhere mainly for reason of indication that there was a real risk of dissipation of assets by LEUNG. The SFC alleged that at the material times between 2010 and 2012, LEUNG, Wong Yu Hong (WONG) and/or Tsiang Hoi Fong implemented a fraudulent scheme under the guise of numerous non-genuine sale and purchase agreements in relation to TV licence rights with a total consideration of HKD327.75 million, while the unjust profits gained by LEUNG or Wong was in the range of HKD35.2 million to HKD74.27 million, being the sums transferred to LEUNG and/or companies owned by LEUNG or WONG. A further step of legal action, the SFC was also seeking disqualification orders, and a compensation order for losses suffered by SMI Culture & Travel Group or alternatively an order to account for any profits gained by the respondents as a result of the alleged fraudulent scheme. For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk To unsubscribe, please click “ unsubscribe ”.

The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter for insurance are as follows: ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – Nov 2024 The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows: 1. Asian Insurance Forum 2024: Navigating Global Volatility 2. CPD Course for Insurance Brokers on Grandfathered ILAS Policies 3. The SFC Announces First Batch of Brokers for Wealth Management Connect Pilot Scheme and Insights on Insurance Connect IA News Updates 1. Asian Insurance Forum 2024: Navigating Global Volatility The IA's annual flagship event, the Asian Insurance Forum (“AIF”), will be held on 10 December 2024 , themed “Rising to the Challenge amidst Global Volatility.” This event will feature prominent speakers from the insurance and financial sectors, as well as regulators and government officials from Hong Kong and around the world. Keynote speakers include Mr. John Lee, Chief Executive of the HKSAR, Mr. Paul Chan, Financial Secretary of the HKSAR, and Mr. Jonathan Dixon, Secretary General of the IAIS. Panel discussions will cover: Global supervisory priorities. Strengthening the headquarters economy. Insurance solutions in wealth management, along with a dialogue with IA leadership. Participants can register online to join the forum virtually for free. For more details and the full program, visit the AIF 2024 website . 2. CPD Course for Insurance Brokers on Grandfathered ILAS Policies The IA published the circular on 8 November 2024 which provides additional details on the CPD course required for compliance with the Grandfathering Arrangements. From 1 October 2024, licensed insurance brokers offering advisory or discretionary investment services for ILAS Policies must meet new competency requirements as per the Practice Note . Grandfathering Arrangements: Licensed insurance brokers unable to meet the new requirements by 1 October 2024 can continue servicing policies issued before this date (Grandfathered ILAS Policies) until 31 July 2027, provided they comply with the Additional CPD requirement. This entails completing 2 additional CPD hours annually in the following periods: 1 August 2024 to 31 July 2025 1 August 2025 to 31 July 2026 1 August 2026 to 31 July 2027 Firs run of the Course for Insurance Brokers on Grandfather ILAS Policies The Hong Kong Securities and Investment Institute (“HKSI”), in collaboration with the Professional Insurance Brokers Association (“PIBA”) and The Hong Kong Confederation of Insurance Brokers (“CIB”), is launching the first Course on 26 November 2024 , which fulfills the Additional CPD requirement under the Grandfathering Arrangements established by IA. Market News 3. SFC Announces First Batch of Brokers for Wealth Management Connect Pilot Scheme and Insights on Insurance Connect SFC has announced that 14 LCs are now eligible to participate in the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect Pilot Scheme (“WMC”) in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (“GBA”). This scheme enhances connectivity between Hong Kong and Mainland China, offering new business opportunities for financial services. Impact on Insurance Brokers and Future of Insurance Connect The success of the WMC is seen as a positive indicator for the potential implementation of similar mechanisms, such as the anticipated Insurance Connect. This would allow Hong Kong and Macau insurance companies to sell insurance products directly to Mainland residents without establishing local branches. However, current Mainland regulations conflict with this approach, and a pilot for Insurance Connect is not yet feasible. Licensed insurer(s), insurance broker companie(s) shall see the WMC as a best practice to get ready for the eventual establishment of Insurance Connect. By familiarizing themselves with cross-boundary operations and regulatory requirements, they can smoothly transition once the Insurance Connect is approved. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the delay in Insurance Connect, preparations for establishing insurance after-sales service centers in Nansha and Qianhai are in their final stages. These centers will offer policy management and claims services for Hong Kong policyholders in the GBA. [End of ComplianceOne Insurance Newsletter – November 2024] For more details, please click on the title of the topic above. ================================= ~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~ ================================= The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607 . Unit 1104, 11/F, 299QRC, 287-299 Queen's Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk