ComplianceOne Newsletter – May 2026
The topics discussed in this monthly newsletter are as follows:
Market News
Enforcement News
SFC obtains disqualification orders against former directors of China Candy Holdings Limited
Movie producer Wong Pak Ming convicted of insider dealing in SFC’s prosecution
SFC Raids Two more Chinese Brokerages in Widening IPO Probe
Regulatory Updates
Markets News
1. Hong Kong overtakes Switzerland as the World’s Top Offshore Wealth Centre
For decades, Switzerland has been synonymous with offshore wealth and private banking, however this era has formally ended. According to the Boston Consulting Group (“BCG”)’s latest Global Wealth Report, Hong Kong has surpassed Switzerland in 2025 to become the world’s single largest destination for cross-border wealth. Assets booked in the city jumped 10.7% in the past year to a massive total reaching USD2.95 trillion. Switzerland comparatively had a 7.6% growth coming in at USD2.94 trillion.
The drivers of this surge in growth can be attributed to the following events: a resurgent IPO market that returned Hong Kong to the top of global fundraising tables, a steady flood of capital from mainland China and market infrastructure reforms at the HKEX spanning equity financing, debt issuance and commodity trading. BCG’s analyst described Hong Kong’s rise as reflecting “the growing gravitational pull of Asian wealth and capital markets,” with cross-border flows becoming more concentrated in a smaller number of globally connected hubs.This momentum is expected to keep growing as denoted by BCG’s projection of annual cross-border wealth growth of approximately 9% for Hong Kong through 2030, suggesting the gap with competitors will widen rather than narrow.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Wealth managers, private banks, external asset managers and financial institutions with regional ambitions this ranking is a commercial sign. The structural case for expanding cross-border wealth management operations in Hong Kong has arguably never been stronger. Firms that are watching cautiously from the sidelines should reconsider their capacity, product and positioning in the city before the next competitive cycle locks in market share.
Enforcement News
2. SFC obtains disqualification orders against former directors of China Candy Holdings Limited
When auditors flag discrepancies in company financial statements and management promises to fix them, independent directors cannot simply take those promises at face value. This was the central lesson delivered by the Court of First Instance this month, when it issued disqualification orders against four former directors of China Candy Holdings Limited (“China Candy”) (HK Stock Code: 8182), whose cash balances had been inflated by as much as 97% in its annual filings from 2016.
The external control reviewers at China Candy identified problems in 2015 and 2016 regarding missing petty cash records, inconsistent management accounts and unresolved bank reconciliation gaps. The four directors, two executive chairpersons and two independent non-executives, confessed to passively relying on external professionals to identify and report potential red flags, which eventually led to the failure to properly scrutinise these issues and verify whether the proposed remedies had been implemented. As a result, their duties were abdicated by the court.
Name | Position | Penalty |
Ms Yvonne HUNG (洪綺婉) | Executive Director | 33 months of disqualification |
Ms Li YUNA (李宇娜) | Executive Director | 24 months of disqualification |
Mr FANGUS Chu Wai Wa (朱偉華) | Independent Director | 12-month ban |
Mr ONG King Keung (王競強) | Independent Director | 12-month ban |
Following these sanctions the case is not over as the three alleged architects of the fraud, including the former chairman and CEO, are awaiting separate judgment following a hearing that concluded in March 2026.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Independent directors cannot outsource their oversight obligations to management or external advisers. When Internal control reviews surface issues, the senior management needs to track remediation to completion. Financial institutions should use this case to promptly review on how their senior management handle follow-through on audit and control findings
3. SFC obtains two-year disqualification order against former financial controller and company secretary of Qunxing Paper Holdings Company Limited
This month, the SFC secured a two-year disqualification against Mr POON Tsz Hang, the former financial controller and company secretary of Qunxing Paper Holdings Company Limited (“Qunxing”), for disclosing false and misleading information regarding the annual turnover of Qunxing published in its financial statements from 2007 to 2011.
Mr POON, the most senior finance office, held a unique vantage point from where the irregularities should have been visible. The SFC found that he failed to exercise basic oversight of the accounting and finance functions that reported to him. He also failed, in his company secretary role, to promptly escalate a critical restructuring event at a subsidiary that pointed to a sudden deterioration in the group’s finances.
Furthermore, the company’s former chairman and his son were ordered by the Court back in 2018 to compensate investors, and HKD92 million was eventually distributed to approximately 27,000 eligible investors in 2023. Poon’s case represents the tail end of an enforcement effort that has now spanned nearly a decade.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Finance professionals in listed companies carry significant personal accountability. As the SFC has demonstrated it will pursue individuals’ years after misconduct occurs, CFOs and company secretaries should take note of the regulatory consequences of inadequate oversight and failure to escalate issues as they can lost beyond a company’s demise.
4. Movie producer Wong Pak Ming convicted of insider dealing in SFC’s prosecution
Well-known film producer and chairman of Pegasus Entertainment Holdings, Mr WONG Pak Ming, was convicted for an insider dealing scandal this month following a 16-day criminal trial.
Case Details
In 2017, Mr WONG received serious, price-sensitive information about the sale of his controlling stake in the company, and within the same day received a HKD 10 million earnest payment from a prospective buyer.
Immediately, upon receiving the earnest money, Wong transferred HKD 2 million to his sister, and advised her to buy over nine million Pegasus shares at prices well below Pegasus’ ensuing market price preceding the deal announcement. Based on the SFC’s calculations it was estimated that Wong’s sister earned more than HKD 1 million from these transactions.
After a 16-day criminal trial at the Eastern Magistrate Court, Mr Wong was convicted of insider dealing whilst sentencing has been adjourned to June 9th, 2026. The SFC commenced criminal proceedings against him in February 2025.
Case Timeline
Date | 25 Aug 2017 | 25 Aug – 30 Aug 2017 | 25 Aug – 17 October 2017 | 25 October 2017 |
Event | Mr. Wong received $10 million in earnest money. | Transferred $2 million to his sister. | Wong’s sister bought over nine million Pegasus shares below market price. | Deal Announced |
SIGNIFICANCE:
This case is a reminder that insider dealing does not require complex trading structures or anonymous offshore accounts. A simple word to family members backed by sensitive information is sufficient to constitute a serious criminal offence. Firms should ensure that information barriers are clearly communicated to senior individuals, and that personal trading policies explicitly address the prohibition on tipping family and friends. The SFC’s readiness to win criminal trials reinforces that consequences are not just regulatory, they are criminal.
5. SFC bans Nerico Brothers Limited’s former responsible officer, manager-in-charge and director Paul Wan Kai Leung for life over US$222 Million Client Asset Scandal
The SFC has drawn a firm line under one of Hong Kong’s most egregious client asset scandals by permanently banning Mr Paul WAN Kai Leung, former responsible officer, manager-in-charge, and director of Nerico Brothers Limited (“NBL”) from the industry.
Between mid-2020 and early 2021, NBL covertly used over USD 68 million of a single client’s funds for the firms gain, breaching the client agreement. The firm then went further, facilitating a fraudulent scheme misappropriating an additional USD 154 million of the same client’s money leading to a combined loss of more than USD 222 million. The orchestrator of this external scheme, Neo Ng Yu, had his firm’s license revoked and received a lifetime ban in separate proceedings.
Furthermore, Mr WAN’s ban follows those already imposed on NBL’s director Jerff Lee Cheuk Fung and the connected principals of Amber Hill Capital in 2025. The SFC is systematically working through the management chain of this misconduct, making clear that a failure to prevent client asset misuse carries equal consequence as the perpetration of client asset misuse.
SIGNIFICANCE:
The effects of these actions send a powerful message to senior management: ignorance or passivity toward the misuse of client funds is not a valid exemption to avoid regulatory scrutiny. All responsible officers and managers must treat client asset protection as a front-line personal obligation, not a compliance department task. Regular independent reconciliation, escalation protocols, and board oversight of client asset controls are now considered as baseline requirements.
6. SFC Raids Two more Chinese Brokerages in Widening IPO Probe
On May 27 the SFC cracked down on the investment banking sector. Enforcement officers raised the Hong Kong offices of CCB International (“CCBI”), local arm of China Construction Bank, and China Securities International (“CSCI”)), a subsidiary of China Securities Co. Electronic devices and documents were seized for investigation into suspected misconduct linked to share offerings.
The raids were notable as they represent a large-scale widening investigation rather than an isolated action. In March 2026, the SFC conducted what was described as one of the most significant enforcement sweeps of the investment banking sector in the past decade, targeting CITIC Securities and Guotai Junan International, during which eight individuals were arrested. The May raids followed 2 months later, targeting two more state-linked Chinese institutions.
Following Hong Kong’s IPO boom, the city surged back to the top of global fundraising rankings, with a wave of new listings across mainland Chinese companies. The SFC has made clear that this boom cannot come at the cost of due diligence standards. The recent raids share the enforcement arm of this message.
The SFC, CSCI and CCBI declined to comment and no formal charges have been filed and no fines announced at the time of writing.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Investment banks and underwriters active in Hong Kong’s ECM market should conduct internal audits of their IPO due diligence and listing advisory procedures. The SFC’s willingness to raid major state-linked institutions signals that firm size and market position provide no regulatory protection or special treatment. Financial institutions and licensed corporations that are proactive in self-reviewing and remediating errors will be better placed than those who wait to be investigated.
Regulatory Updates
7. SFC steps up measures to address forged documents, money laundering risks and account opening standards
On 22 May 2026, the SFC issued a circular outlining the expected controls for account opening and maintenance of client relationships. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has also specified relevant remediation plans for certain illegal cross-boundary securities, futures, and investment fund-related activities conducted in Mainland China. We have prepared an impact analysis on the expected controls for account opening and ongoing client relationship management.
An SFC review of account opening practices across 12 securities has uncovered deficiencies in due diligence on account opening documentation and acceptance of forged documents making their way into client files. Firms accepting them are either unaware or choose not to look hard enough and consequently, the SFC has responded with a forceful circular that sets out binding expectations for every licensed corporation. The regulator identified a collection of recurring failures as a result of superficial due diligence at onboarding, inadequate handling of client introductions through overseas intermediaries, and a general culture of growth at expense of know-your-client procedures. The SFC is explicit that forged documents create pathways for money laundering and terrorist financing through Hong Kong’s securities infrastructure. The
Circular Requirements:
LCs must conduct an internal review to identify whether questionable or forged documents were accepted at account opening. The SFC has specified additional requirements for accounts held by Chinese Mainland Investors including:
Closure of accounts with forged or questionable documents
Closure of zero-balance dormant investment accounts
Written investor declarations and a requirement that all settlements and fund movements use only the client’s own named bank accounts with eligible banks.
The SFC also reminds investors that submitting false documents to open a brokerage account can constitute a criminal offence under the Hong Kong Crimes Ordinance.
SIGNIFICANCE:
The circular demands immediate action from firms to designate a senior individual to own the internal review, set a clear completion deadline, and document findings. For mainland investor accounts specifically, the additional measures apply to all new accounts going forward. The SFC has signaled that follow-up inspections and enforcement will follow firms that have self-identified and remediated problems will be far better positioned than those discovered to have done nothing.
8. FTSB and SFC conclude consultations on Virtual asset advisory and management regimes
Hong Kong has spent the last three years building a legal framework for digital assets. On the 26th of May, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (“FSTB”) and SFC took the final significant step in that project, publishing consultation conclusions that pave the way for licensing regimes covering virtual asset advisory and management service providers.
The framework is deliberately designed to mirror the conventional securities licensing structure: VA advisory services will be regulated in line with Type 4 (advising on securities) and VA asset management will track Type 9 (asset management). The “same activity, same risks, same rules” principle means that firms already operating in asset management or investment advisory should find compliance architecture even if underlying assets are new.
The consultation drew 51 responses from a broad range of stakeholders. The FSTB and SFC have confirmed they are targeting the legislative bill itself to introduce into the legislative council before the end of 2026. The full suite of VA service providers, trading platforms, stable coin issuers, managers, advisors, etc. will sit within a regulated ecosystem upon the approval of the framework.
SFC CEO Ms Julia LEUNG, described the development as “the final leg of our journey to complete the regulatory framework for digital assets” while Secretary Christopher Hui framed it as part of a broader effort to build a digital asset ecosystem “comparable to conventional finance.”
SIGNIFICANCE:
Firms currently providing VA advisory or portfolio management services in Hong Kong should start engaging with the SFC on pre-application discussions now to understand fit and scoping before the bill is tabled. For LCs that already hold Type 4 and Type 9, adding the VA versions may be smoother but still requires separate licensing and possible substantive obligations on licensing, conduct, and client asset handling.
9. SFC issues news guidance to help securities issuers prepare for upcoming uncertificated securities market regime
Hong Kong’s securities market is on the verge of a structural reform that has been years in the making. Physical share certificates, a relic of the paper-era financial system, are being phased out. The SFC has published a Guidance Note to prepare issuers for the Uncertified Securities Market (“USM”) regime, which is scheduled to go live on November 16th, 2026.
Under the implementation of USM, issuers are obliged to maintain an approved securities registrar at all times. Currently, six companies have applied to becoming approved securities registrars. Issuers are also required to complete their amendment exercise by the first anniversary of USM launch by the 16th of November 2027 or by the date of their first annual general meeting post USM launch.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Listed issuers should treat the November 16th launch date deadline as an immediate action item. Issuers are recommended to appoint legal counsel and identify a preferred approved securities registrar from the applicant pool and build the USM amendments into their next AGM agenda. Proactive adoption is critical, delaying until 2027 will result in a missed AGM cycle and potential compliance risk.
[End of ComplianceOne Newsletter – May 2026]
For more details, please click on the title of the topic above.
=================================
~ Make It Right Today, Better Tomorrow ~
=================================
The Newsletter is for general information purpose only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice.
For enquiries, please email to support@complianceone.hk or WhatsApp us at (852) 95164607.
Unit 1605, 16/F, West Tower, Shun Tak Centre,168-200 Connaught Road Central,
Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
Tel: (852) 39550277 www.complianceone.hk